CA1076506A - Apparatus for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation process - Google Patents
Apparatus for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation processInfo
- Publication number
- CA1076506A CA1076506A CA234,634A CA234634A CA1076506A CA 1076506 A CA1076506 A CA 1076506A CA 234634 A CA234634 A CA 234634A CA 1076506 A CA1076506 A CA 1076506A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- hydrocarbon
- phase
- isoparaffin
- olefin
- reaction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C2/00—Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing a smaller number of carbon atoms
- C07C2/54—Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing a smaller number of carbon atoms by addition of unsaturated hydrocarbons to saturated hydrocarbons or to hydrocarbons containing a six-membered aromatic ring with no unsaturation outside the aromatic ring
- C07C2/56—Addition to acyclic hydrocarbons
- C07C2/58—Catalytic processes
- C07C2/62—Catalytic processes with acids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C2527/00—Catalysts comprising the elements or compounds of halogens, sulfur, selenium, tellurium, phosphorus or nitrogen; Catalysts comprising carbon compounds
- C07C2527/02—Sulfur, selenium or tellurium; Compounds thereof
- C07C2527/053—Sulfates or other compounds comprising the anion (SnO3n+1)2-
- C07C2527/054—Sulfuric acid or other acids with the formula H2Sn03n+1
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S585/00—Chemistry of hydrocarbon compounds
- Y10S585/919—Apparatus considerations
- Y10S585/921—Apparatus considerations using recited apparatus structure
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Improved alkylation reactor and reaction emulsion phase separation apparatus is described. Such apparatus includes a non-backmix tubular reactor and is particularly useful in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of isoparaf-fin with olefins for production of high octane value alkylate.
Improved alkylation reactor and reaction emulsion phase separation apparatus is described. Such apparatus includes a non-backmix tubular reactor and is particularly useful in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of isoparaf-fin with olefins for production of high octane value alkylate.
Description
5~6 This invention relates to apparatus for alkylating an alkylatable isoparaf~in hyarocarbon with olefin hydrocarbons. More speci~ically, thiæ
invention relates to apparatus useful for producing alkylated hydrocarbon product from isoparaffin and light olefin reactants utilizing sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst under alkylation reaction conditions including short con-tact time of hydroca~bon and acid catalyst with substnatially no backmixing of ~he reaction mixture within the reaction zone. mis invention further relates to apparatus useful for producing alkylated hydrocarbons having superior quality as co~ponents for motor fuels, as compared to products pro-duced by previ~usly employed alkylation processes.
Alkylatio~ o~ isopara~fin hydrocar~ons such as isobutane, isopentane and the like with olefinic hydrocarbons such as propylene, butylenes, amylenes, and the like, is well-known as a commeraial nethod for producing gasoline boiling range hydrocarbons. The C5 C10 carbon nunber range alkylated hydro-carbon products of such alkylation reactions are particularly useful as motor fuel blending stock because o~ their high motor octane and research octane values. me selectivity of commercial alkylation processes for highly branch-ed isomers of alkylated hydrocarbons determines the maximum product octane values obtainable. Consequently, process apparatus configurations and reac-tion conditions are being actively sought which favor formation of the highly branched alkylate isomers and which impede side reactions such as olefin polymerization, polymer cracking and isomerization. The olefin lB76506;
polymers and their cracked products have s~bstantially lower octane values than alkylate hydrocarbons of similar molecular weight.
Good contact of reactant isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbons with alkylation catalyst under alkylation re-action conditions is critical ~o production of desirable high octane alkylate hydrocarbons. In alkylation reactions employing sulfuric acid as catalyst, the olefin reactants are suhstantially more soluble in the acid catalyst phase than are isoparaffin reactants. Since olefin hydrocarbons will undergo polymerization reactions in the presence of the 88-98 percent sulfuric acid solutions commonly employed a~ alkylation catalysts, operating conditions must be selected to insure good contact of olefin with isopar~ffin in the presence of sulfuric acid catalyst so that alkyla-tion reactions will occur in prlsference to olefin polymeri-~ation reactionsO In currentl~ employed liquid phase alkylation processes this contact of olefin and isoparaffin is obtained by employing isoparaffin in substantlal s~oichiometric excess to olefin and subjecting the olefin-isoparafin-sulfuric acid reaction mixtures to high shear mixing such that emulsions of hydrocarbon and acid are formed. Volume ratios of isoparaffin to olefin charge of from 2/1 to 20/1 are employed to insure the availability of isoparaffin for reaction with the olefin. Isoparaffin to olefin volume ratios of 4~1 and greater are preferred.
Generally, it is preferred that the acid phase be maintained as the continuous phase in the reaction emulsions formed such that the hydrocarbon is present as small droplets suspended in the acid phase.
. . ' ~
~76iS~
Sulfuric acid catalyst concentrations of 40 volume percent and above in an alkylation reaction mix-ture may result in acid continuous emulsions. ConsequPntly acid concentrations in the range of 40~-70 volume percent of an alkylation reaction emulsion are preferred. It has, however, been disclosed ; that hydrocarbon continuous emulsions of isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbon with sulfuric acid may be employed as alkylation reaction mixtures, and acid concentrations as l~w as 10 volume percent in the reaction mixture have been successfully employed.
Reaction tempexatures found acceptable in the prior ar~ for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of iso-paraffin with olefin are in tha range of about -20F to ~ ~bout 100F, with reaction temperatures in the range of ;~ about 40-60F being preferred~ Such alkylation reactions ~ are exothermic. Therefore, the reaction mixture is '~ commonly cooled in the reaction ~one to maintain the desired reaction temperatures. Cooling by both direct and indirect heat exchange techniques is commonly practiced.
,~ 20 One widely practiced technique is to recover the hydro-ca~bon phase o~ a reaction mixture and vaporize a por~ion of the unreacted isoparaffin at reduced pressure and about adiabatic conditions, thereby substantially reducing the temperature of the unvaporized portion of the hydrocarbon phase. This cold liquid hydrocarbon is then used to cool additional reaction mixture in the reaction zone by in-direct heat exchange means.
Alkylation reactions of isoparaffins with olefins have been carried out in both the vapor phase and the liquid phase. In the present application, only those ::
1~65(16 reactions carried out in the liquid phase axe under consider-ation~ Therefore, xeaction pressures sufficient to main-tain reactants in the liquid phase at reaction temperatures are required. Con~e~uently, pressures of from about atmospheric to about 100 psig, or higher axe commonly em-ployed in such alkylation reactionsu Pressures above those required to maintain reactants in the liquid phase have no noticeable affect upon the alkylation reaction.
Commercial apparatus commonly employed for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of i.soparaffin with olefin comprise backmixed reactor vessels equipped with high shear mixing devices such as impellers. Such reaction ve~sels are sized to p~ovide sufficient residence time for conver~ion of su~stantially all olefin with the reaction zon~. The high shear mixing is provided to insure good contact of isoparaffin and olefin reactant in ~he presence of sulfuric acid catalyst. As olefins are substantially more solube in sulfuric acid cal:alyst ~han are isoparaffins, and since olefins tend to polymeri7e in the presence of the sulfuric acid catalyst, high shear mixing of the reaction mixture to insure good contact of isoparaffin with olefin is critical to productlon of a high-octane alkylate product. Con~equently, substantial amo~nts of power are consumed in operation of the high shear mixer~ to provide the re~uired good mixing of reactants. This degree of mixing of a backmixed reactor results in an almost homo-geneous reaction mixture, with ol~fin concentrat.ion about equal throughout the reactor volume. As it is desirable to effect essentially complete olefin conversion in the reaction zone for production of higher octane alkylated ~9765~6 ..
product, olefin concentration is quite low throughout the reaction vessel.
In commercial processes, reaction emulsion effluent from such back-mixed reactoxs discharges into settling vessels wherein hydrocarbon phase, comprising unreacted isoparafin and alkylated hydrocarbon, separates from sulfuric acid catalyst phase by gravity separation.
Separated hydrocarbon phase is fractionated to recover alkylate product and isoparaffin. Separated acid phase and i~oparaffin fraction are returned to the alkylation reactors for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactantsO
In additi~n to proce~ses employing backmixed reactors and high shear mixers, liquid phas processes for alkylation of isoparaffins with olefins in the presence of acid alkylation catalysts and employing nonback mixed, or tubular, reactors have been proposed. For example, see U. s, Patents 3,213,157; 3,169,153; 2,910,522;
,~
; 3,000,994; and 3,456,033. These processes employ about the same reaction temperatures and pressures, ratios of reactants and catalysts, etc., as employed in commercial c backmixed reactor proc~sses. The advantages of nonbackmixed reactors include lower equipment cost and improved alkylate octane value over backmixed reactor systems. The major disadvantage is the difficulty of maintaining the - reaction emulsion without phase separation, throughout the length of the nonback mixed reactors. Such nonhacked mixed reactors may comprise either vertical or horizontal tubular configurations. Generally, isoparaffin and olefin reactants are mixed with acid catalyst at the inlet of ~765~6 such tubular reactors and reaction mixtures comprising un-reacted isoparaffin, alkylated hydrocar~on product and acid catalyst are withdrawn from the outlet of the tubular reactors into settling tanks. In the settling tanks, hydrocarbon phase comprising isoparaffin and alkylate hydro-carbon is separated by gravity settling from acid catalyst phase. Hydrocarbon phase from the settling tank is fractionated to recover alkylate hydrocarbon product and ; isopara~fin. The isoparafin fraction and acid-catalyst phase are returned to ~he inlet of the tubular reactors for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactants.
Tha prior art discloses that such alkylation proce~ses employing nonbacked mixed reactors are ef~ective for improving alkylate quality and octane value when acid catalysts are used in which substantial amounts of isoparaf~in hydrocarbons may be dissolved. Hydrogen fluoride, which will ab~orb about 2.7 weight percent iso-butane at 80F, is particularly effective in such alkyla-tion processes. On the other hand, alkylation processes, employing acid catalysts which do not absorb a substantial amount of isoparaffin reactant do not produce an improve-ment in alkylate quality and octane number. For example, nonbacked mixed processes employing sulfuric acid, which only absorbs about 0.1 percent isobutane at 80F, are not as efficient and do not produce alkylate of improved quality and octane value, as compared to ~ackmixed alkyla-tion processes.
~L~7~50~;
~ A~K ~ V~ o~
Now, according to the method of the present invention, we have dis-covered improved apparatus for alkylating isoparaffin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocarbon in the presence of sulfuric acia alkylation catalyst employing a nonback mixed tubular reactor.
Thus, the present invention provides apparatus for alkylating iso-parrafin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocar~on, in the liquid phase, in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst without high shear mixing in the reactor, which apparatus comprises:
a) mixing means outside the reactor for forming an emulsion of iso-paraffin and olefin reactants and sulfuric acid catalyst;
b) a non-backmix tubular reactor, having an inlet end, an outlet end and a tubular wall, the inlet of which is in communication with said ~ixing means, ~or maintaining the emulsion effluent from said mixing means at alkylation reaction conditions, including a selected te~perature of from about -20 F to about 100 F, an olefin space velocity of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume o~ acid catalyst, and a Reynolds number for said flowing emulsion of at least cibout 5000 ~RE;
c) liquid cyclone centrifugal separation means having an inlet in communication with the outlet of said tubular reactor and having a hydrocarbon ou~let and an acid catalyst outlet, for rapidly separating reaction e~ulsion effluent into a liquid hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon product, and an acid catalyst phase com-prising about 70-100 volume percent acid catalyst and about 30-0 volume per-cent entrained hydrocarbon;
d) a cooling jacket having inlet and outlet means, surrounding said tubular reactor, de~ining a con~ined path for the flow of a refrigerant ~lui~;
e~ a flash drum having an inle~, a top vapor outlet and a bottom liquid outlet, for adiabatically flashing said separated liquid hydrocarbon phase into a hydrocarbon vapor phase and a cooled unvaporize.d hydrocarbon phase;
7 _ f) first conduit means for convey.ing separated liquid hydrocarbon phase from said centrifug~l eparation means to the inlet o~ said flash drum;
g~ a gas compressor, in communication with the top vapor outlet of said ~lash drum for withdrawing said hyarocarbon vapor phase from said flash drum at a subatmospheric pressure;
h) condensing means in communication with said gas compressor dis-charge for condensing hydrocarbon vapor from saia gas compressor;
i) first fractionation means, in communication with said condensing means, for fractionating condensed hydrocarbon vapor in~o a first isoparaffin fraction and a fraction lighter than the first isoparaffin fraction;
j) second conduit means for conveying said first isoparaffin frac-tion from said first fractionation means to .aid mixing means;
k) third conduit means for conveying said cooled, unvaporized hydrocarbon phase from said flash drum to saia cooliny ~acket inlet;
1) second fractionation means for fractionating hydrocarbon ef-fluent from said cooling jacket into a second isoparaffin fraction, a noxmal parafin fraction, and a alkylated hydrvcarbon fraction;
m) fourth conduit means ~ox convey:ing hydrocarbon from said cool-ing jacket outlet to said second fractionation means;
n) means for recycling the second isoparaffin hydrocarbon fraction from said second fractionation means lnto said second conduit means before the inlet of said mixing means for contact wi~h additional reactant hydro-carbons; and o~ m~ans for recycling acid catalys~ phase ~rom said centriPugal separation means to the inlet of said mixing means.
Advantages of the present invention include the economic savings of reduced e~ui~ment and cost and reduced power requirements for processes em~
ploying the tubular reactor apparatus as co~pared to backmixed alkylation processes employing high shear mixingO Additionally, the apparatus of the present invention enables production of alkylate of improved quality and octane value in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation processes.
These advantages and others will be described more fully in the ~ - 7a -.. , . . ~ .
~IB765~6 detaile~ description o~ the invention which follows.
The arawing is a sche~atic aiagram of an alkylation process employ-ing the improved apparatus o~ the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF q~}~E INVENTION
Alkylation processes which are to be performed in the improved ap- -paratus of the present invention are ~hose wherein isoparaffin hydrocarbons such a~ isobutane, isopentane, isohexane, etc. are alkylated with olefin hydxocarbonæ such as propylene, butylene, pentylenes, etc. Preferably, isobutane is selected as the isoparaffin reactant and olefin reactant is selected from propylene, butylenes, and mixtures thereof. Olefin hydrocar~ons .
, ~ 7 65~ ~
in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation catalysts tend to undergo polymerization reactions as well as the desirable alkylation reactions wi-~h isoparaffin hydrocarbons. In order to increase selectivity of olefin con~ersion to alky-late hydrocarbons, a substantial stoichiometic excess of isoparaffin reactant is desirable. Liquid volume ratios of isoparaffin to olefin of from about 2/1 to about 20/1 are contemplated in the present invention. Preferably, isoparaffin to olefin ratios of at least 4/1 are employed.
Reactant hydrocarbon charge ~treams normally employed in commercial alkylation processes are derived from refinery process streams and may contain small amounts of impurities such as n-butane, propane, etc. Such impurities are undesirable in large concentration as they occupy alkyla-tion reactor volume, thus decreasing reactor capacity available for the desired reactants. Conseguently, process charge streams and/or recycle streams are usually fractionated to remove a substantial portion of such paraffinic impurities.
Alkylation catalysts contemplated for use in the apparatus of the present invention comprise from about 88 weight percent to about 98 weight percent H2S04, prefer-ably from about 96 weight percent to about 88 weight per-cent H2SO4. At H2$04 concentrations above 98 weight per-cent, the rate of the alkylation reaction decreases and the octane value of alkylate product decreases. At H2SO4 concentrations below about 88 weight percent, olefin polymerization reactions increase, thus reducing the octane value of the alkylate product. For an effective alkyla-tion catalyst, some water and acid oil must be present ~8-, ., .
: . . : . .
~L~7~iS~
with th~ ~2S04 . That is, fresh H2S04 of about 98 weight percent concentration containing about 2 weight percent H20 has little activity as an alkylation catalyst, and an induction ~eriod of contact wi~h hydrocarbon reac~ant under alkylation reaction conditions is necessary to promote the catalyst activity. During this induction period, acid oils which are high molecular weight reaction produc~s of H2S0~
~and hydrocarbon reactants, are genPrated. Thus an effective alkylation catalyst will comprise from about 88-98 weight percent H2S04 t from about 1-8 weight percent ~2 and from about 1-6 weight percent acid oils. In addition, a small amount of a compound for increasing solubility of isoparaffin in sulfuric acid catalysts is helpful when using the tubular reactors of the present invention. With such sul-furic acid catalysts comprising ~2S04, H20 and acid oils, solubility of isoparaffin in the catalyst phase 1s quite low, while olefins are substantially soluble ln th0 catalyst. Consequently, in commercial processes, high shear mixing is employed such that an emulsion of hydro-carbon and acid catalyst is formed to insure contact of isoparaffin and olefin reactants in the presence of the catalyst phase. If such mixing is not provided, then isoparaffin will not effectively contact olefin absorbed in the acid catalyst and olefin will tend to polymerize rather than alkylate with such isoparaffin. Such olefin polymers produce heavy alkylate of Cg and greater carbon number having low octane value. Olefin polymers also crack in the presence of acid catalyst producing light alkylate of C5-C7 carbon number, which likewi~e has low octane value. For these reasons, sommercial alkylation _g_ .
~7~5~6 processes for alkylation of isoparaffins with olefin in the presence oE sulfuric acid have not been successful in non-back mixed, or tubular, reactors without extraneous high shear mixing to maintain hydrocarbon-acid catalyst emulsions.
However, we ha~e discovered, when solubility o isobutane in sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst is increased to about 1 volume p~rcent or more, high quality alkylate of high octane value can be produced in nonbacked mixed reactors wherein no extraneous mixing is provided.
One group of compounds which may be employed advantageously for improving solubility of isoparaffins in sulfuric acid catalyst are amphiphilic compounds which form association colloids or micelles in acid solutions.
Amphiphilic compounds are che~ical compounds the molecules of which possess distinct regions of hydrophobic and hydro-philic character. In acid solutions, aggregations of the amphiphiles form spherical micelles in which the hydropho-bic portion of the amphiphi les are located in the interior of the micelle and the hydrophilic portion of the amphiphiles' are at the surface of the micelle. The hydrophophilic portion o a micelle is ionic and/or polar whereas the hydrophobic portion is a non-polar hydxocarbon radical, preferably comprlsing a straight chain of 8 to 20~ carbon atoms. The hydrocarbon radicals, when forming the interior of the micelle, are capable of taking into solution the non-polar isopaxaffin reactants. Thus, the micelle forming amphiphilic compounds bring non-polar isoparaffin reactants into solution with the polar sulfuric acid catalysts. The -micell es formed are not static species, but rather exist in dynamic equilibrium with the associated polar and non-polar molecules. Consequently, micelles are contstantly formed and disassociated, bringing into solution with the acid catalyst and releasing it for contact with olefin reactant under condition~ favorable for alkylation reactions to proceed.
A variety of amphiphilic compounds are known to form micelles in sviution. These are of three classes:
cationic t anionic and nonionic. For use in the present invention, such amphiphilic agents must form micelles and must be reasonably stable in acid solution. Examples of - compounds which are capable of forming micelles and which are known to enhance acid catalyzed alkylation reactions include: N-(alkyl)~enzene sulfonamides; N-(alkyl) alkyl sulfonanides, alkyl sulfonium salts, alkyl phosphonium salt~, alkyl benzene sulfonic acids, aliphatic amines, and N'NN" tris (alkyl) phosphonic triamides, alkyl ammonium salts, and salts of alkyl sulfates. It has ~een ~ound necessary that such,amphiphilic compounds contain at least one aliphatic alkyl radical of 8 to 24 carbon atoms The total number of carbon atoms may be from 8 to 60.
Amphiphilic compounds which are preferred in the practice of the present invention are N-(alkyl) benzene sulonamides wherein the (alkyl) radical iS straight chain having from about 10 to 20 ¢arbon atoms, and N-(alkyl) alkyl sulfon-. .
amides wherein the (alkyl) attached to the nltrogen atom is a straight chain having from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and the alkyl radical attached to the sulfur atom is a paraffin or cyclo-paraffin radical having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. A particularly preferred amphiphilic com-pound is N-(octadecyl) benzene sulfonamide. In addition ~11-~L~76~ 6 to a capability for forming micelles in acid solution, such amphiphilic compounds in sufficient concentration tend to form emulsions of acid catalyst and hydrocarbon reactants.
Should the concentration of such amphiphilic compounds be too great, the emulsions formed are rather stable and separation of acid catalyst from hydrocarbon ~s hindered.
Rapid separation of alkylation reaction emulsion into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid phase is desirable for effec-tive processing of the hydrocarbon, for recovery of the alkylate product, and for recycle of the separated acid phase as catalyst to the alkylation reaction zone. In view of the emulsion forming tendencies of ~uch amphiphilic compounds the maximum amount of such compvunds used must be carefully controlled. Thus, not more than about 0.5 weight percent of a selected amphiphilic compound should be incorporated into a sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst in -order to avoid formation of stable hydrocarbon-acid emul-sions. Preferably, ~ot more than about 0.1 weight percent of the selected amphiphilic compound is employed with the sulfuric acid catalys~. The amoun~ of select amphiphilic compound~ must be equivalent at least about 0.0005 weight percent of the sulfuric acid catalyst in order to obtain any substantial benefit in an alkylation proce~s.
Temperatures which may be used in alkylation proce~ses performed in the apparatus of the present inven-tion are in the range from about -20C to about lOO~F.
Lower temperature~ favor alkylation reactions of i~oparaffins with olefin over competing olefin polymeriza-tior~ reactionsO However~ over all reaction rates decrease at lower temperatures. Preferred alkylation reaction ~71~5iD~;
temperatures in the range of from abou~ 40-70F, provide good selectivity for alkyla~ion of isoparaffin with olefin at an acceptable reaction rate.
Superatmospheric reaction pressures sufficient to maintain all reactants in the liquid phase are required.
Reaction pressures of from about 10 20 about 200 psig and higher may be used. Additionally, when ~he centrifugal separation device is a liquid cyclone, it is advantageous for the pressure to be sufficiently high to provide kinetic energy for separation of the reaction emulsion into a hydro-carbon phase and an acid phase. Pressures of 50-500 psig, or higher are adequate for effectin$ such phase separation in a liquid cyclone.
Residence time of reaction emulsion, comprising reactant hydrocarbons, acid catalyst and alkylate hydro-carbon in the reaction zone is commonly expressed as olefin space velocity. That is, as volumes of olefin per hour per volume o catalyst. In the present invention olefin space velocities in the range of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume o catalyst may be employed. When the volume xatio of isoparaffin to olefin is in the range of 2/1 to 20~1 and the reactant emulsion comprises 40-70 volume percent acid catalyst within this range substantially all the olefin is converted in the reaction zohe. At higher olefin space velocities~ all the olefin may not react in the reaction zone. At low-space velocities side reactions, such as cracking, may become sign1ficant. Reactants should be maintained in the r~-action zone only for a residence time sufficient for conversion of the olefi~ reactant at the selected reaction 1~765~)6 conditions. We have also discovered that the hydrocarbon pha~e comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product should be separated from the alkylation acid catalyst as soon as possible after the reaction mixtures leaves the reaction zone. A preferred embodiment of the present inven-tion incorporates means for rapid separation of the reaction effluent into hydrocarbon phase and acid phase, and with-drawal of the separated phases without prolonged contact such as is presently experienced in acid settler drums employed in presently utilized processes. That is r we have discovered that limiting contact of hydrocarbon reactant and products with acid catalyst to as nearly as possible the time required for conversion of olefin reactant substantially improves ~he quality and octane value of the alkylate product.
In the present inven~ion, a nonback mixed reactor is contemplated. Extraneous backmixing of reactants in the reaction zone is not contemplated. We have discovered, that by employing the apparatus of the present invention isoparaffin hydrocarbons may be alkylated with olefin hydro-carbons in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation alky~
lation catalyst in a nonback mixed, or tubular, reactor without high shear mixing in the reaction zone~ This result is unexpected for hereto~ore it has been experienced that high shear mixing of the reaction emulsion is required in a baakmixed reactor to maintain good contact of iso-paraffin and olefin in the presence of sulfuric acid alky-lation catalyst. Addition of selected micelle forming amphiphilic compounds, as hereinabove described, to the sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst substantially improves 765~6 contact of isoparaffin hydrocarbon witb olefin hydrocarbon in intimate contact with the sulfuric acid catalyst.
As is discussed herein, the ~lkylation reaction is much favored by establishing a xeaction emulsion com-prising reactant isoparaffin hydrocarbons suspended in a continuous sulfuric acid catalyst phase. Although in the present invention we do not contemplate the necessity of ~ -providing high shear mixing in the reaction zone to main-tain such an emulsion, we do find it necessary to charge reactants and catalysts to the reactor as such an emulsion.
Such an emulsion of isoparaffin, olefin and sulfuric acid catalyst containing an amphiphilic compound may readily be established with conventional mi~ing equipment. For example, the emulsion may be formed by charging the reac-tants and catalyst, in the desired ratios as described herein, to mixing devices such as mi.xing valves, centrifugal mixing mpumps, high shear centrifugal mixers, turbine mixers, ultrasonic mixers, and other mechanical devices suitable for mixing i~miscible liquids. A mixing valve, such as a globe valve may be used to good advantage in the present invantion. Preferably, a mixing pump is employed in the present invention. A mixing pump, such as a centrifugal pump, provides sufficient shear to form the desired hydro~
carbon in acid emulsion. Additionally, such a pump provides the head required to flow the reactant emulsion through the nonback mixed reactor at flow velocities, as described below, required to maintain the emulsion without phase separation. It is within the contemplation of the present invention that the reactant emulsion discharging ~ . .
1 ~ 65~ ~
from the mixing device, whether mixing valve, mixing pump, or other mixing device, will directly enter the reactor inlet through a minimum length of transition conduit at flow velocities sufficient to prevent any phase separation of the emulsion. Upon mixing reac-tant isoparaffin and ole-fin hydrocarbons with the sulfuric acid catalyst, the e~o-thermic alkylation will begin. Consequently, emulsion residence time within the mixing device and transition conduit must be relatively short to prevent an undesirable temperature increase before the reaction emulsion enters the refrigerated reactor. Mixing valves and mixing pumps characteristically have small holding volumes and are amenable to rather close coupling to other process equip-ment.
In the practice of our invention we use an elongated tubular reactor having inlet and outlet means.
The reactor diameter is chosen such that the Reynolds number (NRE) of the 1Owing reaction emulsion is at least about 5000 NRE and preferably is in the range of about 5000-20,000 NR~ Higher Reynolds numbers do not contri-bute substantially to the alkylation reaction. At Reynolds t numbers below about 5000 NRE, the reaction emulsion may not be maintained and the reaction emulsion may separate into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid phase.
Should separation occur, olefin conversion may be incomplete -and/or ole~in polymerization reactions may become substantial due to separation of isopa~affin reactants into a separate phase. The length of the tubular reactor is selected to provide the desired olefin space velocity in the range of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin , ~, .
65~6 per hour per volume of catalyst. Contact of reactant hydrocarbon with sulfuric acid catalyst for the minimum time re~uired for essentially complete conversion of ole-~in reactant is preferred.
Reactors in parallel may be employed according to the present invention. By using tubular reactors in parallel, an alkylation process with increased capacity may be operated without the necessity of duplicating process e~uipment collaterial to the tubular reactors.
Reaction temperatures in the range of about -20F to about 100F may be employed as hereinabove stated.
Reactants may be cooled to the desired reaction temperature prior to being introduced into the reaction zone. However, the alkylation reaction i~ exothexmie and cooling in the reaction zone must be provided to maintain the desired re-action temperature. ~xternal, indirect cooling of the tubular reaction zone is contemplated in the present inven-tion. Particularly ef~ective is the use of a cooling jacket surround the tubulax reactor. That is, a cold fluid flows as refrigerant in a jacket surrounding the tubular reactor, absorbing the heat of the alkylation reaction. In the case of several tubular reactors in parallel, a reactor configuration of the Shell and tube design may be efficiently employed. Flow of the refrigerant fluid may be co-current or countercurrent to the flow of reactant hydrocarbon.
Co-current flow will allow some increase in reaction mi~-ture temperature along the length of the reaction tube, such that the reaction kemperature is highest in the portion of the reaction tube wherein the concentration of olefin reactant is lowest. This co-current flow of refrigerant .~........
~765~6 fluid and reaction mixture, with the concomitant tempera-ture increase along the reactor length, will encourage complete conversion of olefin at low concentrations. With countercurrent flow of refrigerant fluid and reaction emulsion, temperatures along the length of the reaction zone may be maintained more nearly equal, if desired.
Refrigerant may be a refrigerant fluid separat~ly provided for the purpose, or i~ may comprise a process stream. For an example of the latter, separated hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product may be flashed under approximately adiabatic conditions at sukatmospheric pressure to vaporize a portion of the isoparaffin. The remaining, unflashed hydrocarbon liquid is cooled by the adiabatic vaporization of the isoparaffin, and this cooled liquid may be used as refrigerant fluid circulated through the cooling jacket for remo~al of the heat of reaction from the reaction zone.
Efficient transfer of heat from the reaction mix-ture to the refrigerant fluid is desirable. Particularly useful aids to the transfer of heat from the reaction emulsion to the wall o~ the reactor are static mixers.
Particularly those disclosed in U. S. Patent 3,286,992 and sold under the tradename "Kenics Mixers"O These mixers -comprise twisted ribbons of metal of substantially the same width as the diameter of the reactor tube. The twisted ribbons are arranged in a configuration which not only insures good transverse mixing of the reaction mix-ture within the reaction zone, but also transfers reaction mixture from the interior to the wall of the reaction tubel thus bringing all the reaction mixture systematically into contact with the cooled tube wall. Heat transfer ~76~ 6 ~rom a tube equipped with such static mixers i~ many times grea~er than from a tube not so e~uipped. O~her static mixers than these of the "Kenics" design are available, although, the "Kenics" mixer is the simplest of construction and has the lowest pressure drop for an equivalent degree of mixing. In addition to improve heat transfer from the tubular reactor such static mixers substantially aid maintenance of the reaction emulsion without phase separation in the reaction tube. Such sta~ic mixers, at usually encountered flow velocities, are not effective for forming an emulsion of hydrocarbon reactants in sulfuric acid catalyst, ~ut are useful for maintaining such an emulsionl once formed. The uses of such static mixers for improving heat transer from a t:ube, and for providing substantial mixing of fluids at a very low pressure drop, are well-known ar.d axe widely practiced~
In the process o f the present invention, liquid reaction emulsion affluent exitC; the tubular reaction æone at a high ~elocity required to maintai~ a Reynolds number of at least 5000 NRE in the reaction zone. The kinetic energy of the flowing effluent is utilized for obtaining rapld separation of the emulsion effluent into a hydrocarbon comprises unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product, substantially free of acid catalyst. The separated acid phase comprises sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst and a minor amount of hydrocarbon. That is, the separated acid phase comprises about 100-70 volume percent sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst and about 0-30 volume percent hydro-carbon. Additionally, the amphiphilic compound employed ~176Sal6 with the sulfuric acid alkylation catalys~ remains in the separated acid phase. The kinetic energy of the flowing reaction effluent emulsion is utilized for separation of the hydrocarbon and sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst phases in a mechanical separation device employing centri-fugal forces, such as a liquid cyclone~ centrifuge, etc. --Liquid cyclone separation devices are particularly effective for rapidly separating the heavier acid phase from the lighter hydrocarbon phase. Such a cyclone is basically a centrifugal machine utilizing the forces of gravity for separating two immiscible fluids having different specific gravities. Such gravity force equip-ment "parts" ~he immiscible fluids by means of differences in specific gravity. Equipment using gravity force~, including cyclones, can be characteriæed by the level of the forces developed, residence time provided9 and the turbulene created. A settler~ for example, allows long residence time and gives essentially quiescent conditions.
On the other hand, liquid cyclones develop forces up to 1000 g or more, have very short residence times, and provide turbulent action.
In the case of gravity force machines, ease of separation depends upon Stokes' Laws variables; i.e., separability is directly proportional to the immiscible droplet diameter squared times the specific ~ravity differential between the immiscible fluids, and is inverssly porportional to the viscosity of the continuous fluid.
Although the relationship is valid and straight forward, the variables themselves are difficult to determine9 and if known are not directly usable. For -20~
1~765~6 instance, an emulsion may contain immiscible droplets of known size suspended in a continuous medium, however deforma-tion of the droplets may impart shapes detrimental to separability. Or, if many droplets are in suspension, they tend to collide and, hence, do not settle well. On the other hand, droplet coalescence, induced or natural, can provide a decided improvement in separability.
The effect of viscosity as a factor on separabi-lity is sometimes difficult to determine; under dynamic conditions such as occur in cyclones, viscosity can rarely be measured. For these reasons, then~ reliance must even-tually be placed upon empirical tests to resolve any given separation problem. However, cyclones for separation of solids from fluids and for separation of fluids from fluids are well-known in the art, and one skilled in the art can make a preliminary judgement as to possible cyclone application by comparing the Stokes' Law Variables of previously tested standard slurries, an the new, untested emulsions.
Such cyclone separators comprise a cyclindrical upper section attached to a conical lower sectionO The inlet stream enters the cylindrical section tangentially, so that a velocity redistribution is involved, resulting in a tangentail velocity component which increases with decreasing radius. The flow path invokes a double vortex, with downward spiraling flow at the outside and upward spiraling flow at the center. Spiral velocities may reach values several times the average velocity in the inlet section. The more dense phase of the inlet stream, by virtue of its inertia, will tend to move toward the outside .
.
1~71~5~6 wal~ and pass downward through the conical section, to be removed into a suitable receiver. The less dense phase will pass upward in the central upward spiral flow to be removed at the top of the cyclone through a tube. The centrifugal separating force, or acceleration may range fxom about 5 ~imes gravity for large, low resistance units to about 2,500 times gravity for small, high pres~ure drop units.
One advantage of such a separation device, utilizing centrifugal ~or gravity) force to separate the hydrocarbon phase from the acid phase, is the kinetic energy of the reaction zone effluent is effectively used and additional energy need not be expendedO Another ad~
vantage is, the hydrocar~on phase may be rapidly separated from the~ acid phase without an extended period of contact such as is experien~ed in a gravity settling vessel. The overall short contact time of hydrocarbon reactants, and alkylate products with sulfuric acid catalyst in a tubular reactor and centrifugal phase separator contribute materially to the good quality and high octane value of ;~
alkylate product. Undesirable side reactions which procaed at 8~ ower rates than the alkylation reaction such as cracking, isomerization, polymerization, and self-alkyla-tion reactions are minimized when contact of hydrocarbon and acid catalyst is limited to essentially the time required for conversion of essentially all the olefin reactant.
A third advankage of a mechanical separation device operating upon the principle of centxifugal separa-tion of the hydrocarbon phase and the acid catalyst phase 5~6 resides in the charac~eristic of such devices which allows the dagree of separation to be closely controlled and varied within a substantial range. That is, by selection of a properly si~ed separation device for the expected flow of reaction effluent, ~he hydrocarbon phase may be recovered subs*antially fxee of acid catalyst and the acid phase may be recovared with a controlled hydrocarbon content. For instance, a liquid cyclone is operated such that hydrocarbon phase is withdrawn substantially free of acid, and acid phase is withdrawn at rate to prevent accumulation of acid phase in the cyclone. The rate of acid phase withdrawal may be adjusted to withdraw a volume equivalent only to the volume of acid catalyst entering the cyclone, in which the hydrocarbon content of the acid phase will be quite low, in the range of 0-2 volume percent. Or, if desired, the rate of acid phase withdrawal may be :;ncreased to a value some-what greater than the volume of acid catalyst entering the cyclone in which event the hydrocarbon content of the acid phase will be increased, in the range of 2~30 volume per-cent. The operation of a sulfuric acid catalyzed alkyla-tion process is substantially improved when acid catalyst phase entering the reaction zone contains a minor portion of hydrocarbon, in the range of 0-30 volume percent and preferably in the range of 3-8 volume percentO The presence of such hydrocarbon in the acid phase improves emulsification of acid phase and hydrocarbon reactants t causing the desired alkylation reactions to predominate over undesired side reactions. By using separation devices operating upon the principle of centrifugal separation of the phases, the hydrocarbon content of the ~eparated acid phase, which is recycled within the alkylation process, may ~6~i~6 be easily controlled within the desired range.
In operating of such separation devices as described above, we have discovered that separation of acid phase from the hydrocarbon phase can be substantially improved if the reaction emulsion entering the separation device has a hydrocarbon continuous phase wi~h acid catalyst entrained there~in. That is, hydrocarbon phase substantially free of acid catalyst is more easily separated from an emulsion wherein thP hydrocarbon phase is continuous with small drop-lets of acid catalyst suspended therein. However, for efficient alkylation of isoparaffin with olefin in a tubular reactor, an emulsion comprising acid catalyst continuous phase is preferred. Acid catalyst continuous phase emulsions with isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbons which are useful in alkylation reactions may comprise about 40-70 volume percent acid catalystr We have found that such reaction zone emulsion effluents may readily be converted from acid phase continuous emulsions to hydrocarbon phase continuous emul-sions by dilution of the emulsion with additional hydrocarbon to obtain diluted emulsion. Comprising 60 volume perc~nt or more hydrocarbon phase. In the process of the present in-vention, dilution of the reaction zone effluent emulsion is effectively accomplished by circulating a portion o~ the separated hydrocarbon phase from the outlet of the separa-tion device for contact with reaction zone effluent emulsion at the inlet of said separation device. By this means an acid phase continuous reaction emulsion may be maintained in the reaction zone, and at the re~ction zone outlet the emulsion effluent may be converted to an emulsion with a continuous hydrocarbon phase for more efficient separation.
invention relates to apparatus useful for producing alkylated hydrocarbon product from isoparaffin and light olefin reactants utilizing sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst under alkylation reaction conditions including short con-tact time of hydroca~bon and acid catalyst with substnatially no backmixing of ~he reaction mixture within the reaction zone. mis invention further relates to apparatus useful for producing alkylated hydrocarbons having superior quality as co~ponents for motor fuels, as compared to products pro-duced by previ~usly employed alkylation processes.
Alkylatio~ o~ isopara~fin hydrocar~ons such as isobutane, isopentane and the like with olefinic hydrocarbons such as propylene, butylenes, amylenes, and the like, is well-known as a commeraial nethod for producing gasoline boiling range hydrocarbons. The C5 C10 carbon nunber range alkylated hydro-carbon products of such alkylation reactions are particularly useful as motor fuel blending stock because o~ their high motor octane and research octane values. me selectivity of commercial alkylation processes for highly branch-ed isomers of alkylated hydrocarbons determines the maximum product octane values obtainable. Consequently, process apparatus configurations and reac-tion conditions are being actively sought which favor formation of the highly branched alkylate isomers and which impede side reactions such as olefin polymerization, polymer cracking and isomerization. The olefin lB76506;
polymers and their cracked products have s~bstantially lower octane values than alkylate hydrocarbons of similar molecular weight.
Good contact of reactant isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbons with alkylation catalyst under alkylation re-action conditions is critical ~o production of desirable high octane alkylate hydrocarbons. In alkylation reactions employing sulfuric acid as catalyst, the olefin reactants are suhstantially more soluble in the acid catalyst phase than are isoparaffin reactants. Since olefin hydrocarbons will undergo polymerization reactions in the presence of the 88-98 percent sulfuric acid solutions commonly employed a~ alkylation catalysts, operating conditions must be selected to insure good contact of olefin with isopar~ffin in the presence of sulfuric acid catalyst so that alkyla-tion reactions will occur in prlsference to olefin polymeri-~ation reactionsO In currentl~ employed liquid phase alkylation processes this contact of olefin and isoparaffin is obtained by employing isoparaffin in substantlal s~oichiometric excess to olefin and subjecting the olefin-isoparafin-sulfuric acid reaction mixtures to high shear mixing such that emulsions of hydrocarbon and acid are formed. Volume ratios of isoparaffin to olefin charge of from 2/1 to 20/1 are employed to insure the availability of isoparaffin for reaction with the olefin. Isoparaffin to olefin volume ratios of 4~1 and greater are preferred.
Generally, it is preferred that the acid phase be maintained as the continuous phase in the reaction emulsions formed such that the hydrocarbon is present as small droplets suspended in the acid phase.
. . ' ~
~76iS~
Sulfuric acid catalyst concentrations of 40 volume percent and above in an alkylation reaction mix-ture may result in acid continuous emulsions. ConsequPntly acid concentrations in the range of 40~-70 volume percent of an alkylation reaction emulsion are preferred. It has, however, been disclosed ; that hydrocarbon continuous emulsions of isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbon with sulfuric acid may be employed as alkylation reaction mixtures, and acid concentrations as l~w as 10 volume percent in the reaction mixture have been successfully employed.
Reaction tempexatures found acceptable in the prior ar~ for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of iso-paraffin with olefin are in tha range of about -20F to ~ ~bout 100F, with reaction temperatures in the range of ;~ about 40-60F being preferred~ Such alkylation reactions ~ are exothermic. Therefore, the reaction mixture is '~ commonly cooled in the reaction ~one to maintain the desired reaction temperatures. Cooling by both direct and indirect heat exchange techniques is commonly practiced.
,~ 20 One widely practiced technique is to recover the hydro-ca~bon phase o~ a reaction mixture and vaporize a por~ion of the unreacted isoparaffin at reduced pressure and about adiabatic conditions, thereby substantially reducing the temperature of the unvaporized portion of the hydrocarbon phase. This cold liquid hydrocarbon is then used to cool additional reaction mixture in the reaction zone by in-direct heat exchange means.
Alkylation reactions of isoparaffins with olefins have been carried out in both the vapor phase and the liquid phase. In the present application, only those ::
1~65(16 reactions carried out in the liquid phase axe under consider-ation~ Therefore, xeaction pressures sufficient to main-tain reactants in the liquid phase at reaction temperatures are required. Con~e~uently, pressures of from about atmospheric to about 100 psig, or higher axe commonly em-ployed in such alkylation reactionsu Pressures above those required to maintain reactants in the liquid phase have no noticeable affect upon the alkylation reaction.
Commercial apparatus commonly employed for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of i.soparaffin with olefin comprise backmixed reactor vessels equipped with high shear mixing devices such as impellers. Such reaction ve~sels are sized to p~ovide sufficient residence time for conver~ion of su~stantially all olefin with the reaction zon~. The high shear mixing is provided to insure good contact of isoparaffin and olefin reactant in ~he presence of sulfuric acid catalyst. As olefins are substantially more solube in sulfuric acid cal:alyst ~han are isoparaffins, and since olefins tend to polymeri7e in the presence of the sulfuric acid catalyst, high shear mixing of the reaction mixture to insure good contact of isoparaffin with olefin is critical to productlon of a high-octane alkylate product. Con~equently, substantial amo~nts of power are consumed in operation of the high shear mixer~ to provide the re~uired good mixing of reactants. This degree of mixing of a backmixed reactor results in an almost homo-geneous reaction mixture, with ol~fin concentrat.ion about equal throughout the reactor volume. As it is desirable to effect essentially complete olefin conversion in the reaction zone for production of higher octane alkylated ~9765~6 ..
product, olefin concentration is quite low throughout the reaction vessel.
In commercial processes, reaction emulsion effluent from such back-mixed reactoxs discharges into settling vessels wherein hydrocarbon phase, comprising unreacted isoparafin and alkylated hydrocarbon, separates from sulfuric acid catalyst phase by gravity separation.
Separated hydrocarbon phase is fractionated to recover alkylate product and isoparaffin. Separated acid phase and i~oparaffin fraction are returned to the alkylation reactors for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactantsO
In additi~n to proce~ses employing backmixed reactors and high shear mixers, liquid phas processes for alkylation of isoparaffins with olefins in the presence of acid alkylation catalysts and employing nonback mixed, or tubular, reactors have been proposed. For example, see U. s, Patents 3,213,157; 3,169,153; 2,910,522;
,~
; 3,000,994; and 3,456,033. These processes employ about the same reaction temperatures and pressures, ratios of reactants and catalysts, etc., as employed in commercial c backmixed reactor proc~sses. The advantages of nonbackmixed reactors include lower equipment cost and improved alkylate octane value over backmixed reactor systems. The major disadvantage is the difficulty of maintaining the - reaction emulsion without phase separation, throughout the length of the nonback mixed reactors. Such nonhacked mixed reactors may comprise either vertical or horizontal tubular configurations. Generally, isoparaffin and olefin reactants are mixed with acid catalyst at the inlet of ~765~6 such tubular reactors and reaction mixtures comprising un-reacted isoparaffin, alkylated hydrocar~on product and acid catalyst are withdrawn from the outlet of the tubular reactors into settling tanks. In the settling tanks, hydrocarbon phase comprising isoparaffin and alkylate hydro-carbon is separated by gravity settling from acid catalyst phase. Hydrocarbon phase from the settling tank is fractionated to recover alkylate hydrocarbon product and ; isopara~fin. The isoparafin fraction and acid-catalyst phase are returned to ~he inlet of the tubular reactors for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactants.
Tha prior art discloses that such alkylation proce~ses employing nonbacked mixed reactors are ef~ective for improving alkylate quality and octane value when acid catalysts are used in which substantial amounts of isoparaf~in hydrocarbons may be dissolved. Hydrogen fluoride, which will ab~orb about 2.7 weight percent iso-butane at 80F, is particularly effective in such alkyla-tion processes. On the other hand, alkylation processes, employing acid catalysts which do not absorb a substantial amount of isoparaffin reactant do not produce an improve-ment in alkylate quality and octane number. For example, nonbacked mixed processes employing sulfuric acid, which only absorbs about 0.1 percent isobutane at 80F, are not as efficient and do not produce alkylate of improved quality and octane value, as compared to ~ackmixed alkyla-tion processes.
~L~7~50~;
~ A~K ~ V~ o~
Now, according to the method of the present invention, we have dis-covered improved apparatus for alkylating isoparaffin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocarbon in the presence of sulfuric acia alkylation catalyst employing a nonback mixed tubular reactor.
Thus, the present invention provides apparatus for alkylating iso-parrafin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocar~on, in the liquid phase, in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst without high shear mixing in the reactor, which apparatus comprises:
a) mixing means outside the reactor for forming an emulsion of iso-paraffin and olefin reactants and sulfuric acid catalyst;
b) a non-backmix tubular reactor, having an inlet end, an outlet end and a tubular wall, the inlet of which is in communication with said ~ixing means, ~or maintaining the emulsion effluent from said mixing means at alkylation reaction conditions, including a selected te~perature of from about -20 F to about 100 F, an olefin space velocity of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume o~ acid catalyst, and a Reynolds number for said flowing emulsion of at least cibout 5000 ~RE;
c) liquid cyclone centrifugal separation means having an inlet in communication with the outlet of said tubular reactor and having a hydrocarbon ou~let and an acid catalyst outlet, for rapidly separating reaction e~ulsion effluent into a liquid hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon product, and an acid catalyst phase com-prising about 70-100 volume percent acid catalyst and about 30-0 volume per-cent entrained hydrocarbon;
d) a cooling jacket having inlet and outlet means, surrounding said tubular reactor, de~ining a con~ined path for the flow of a refrigerant ~lui~;
e~ a flash drum having an inle~, a top vapor outlet and a bottom liquid outlet, for adiabatically flashing said separated liquid hydrocarbon phase into a hydrocarbon vapor phase and a cooled unvaporize.d hydrocarbon phase;
7 _ f) first conduit means for convey.ing separated liquid hydrocarbon phase from said centrifug~l eparation means to the inlet o~ said flash drum;
g~ a gas compressor, in communication with the top vapor outlet of said ~lash drum for withdrawing said hyarocarbon vapor phase from said flash drum at a subatmospheric pressure;
h) condensing means in communication with said gas compressor dis-charge for condensing hydrocarbon vapor from saia gas compressor;
i) first fractionation means, in communication with said condensing means, for fractionating condensed hydrocarbon vapor in~o a first isoparaffin fraction and a fraction lighter than the first isoparaffin fraction;
j) second conduit means for conveying said first isoparaffin frac-tion from said first fractionation means to .aid mixing means;
k) third conduit means for conveying said cooled, unvaporized hydrocarbon phase from said flash drum to saia cooliny ~acket inlet;
1) second fractionation means for fractionating hydrocarbon ef-fluent from said cooling jacket into a second isoparaffin fraction, a noxmal parafin fraction, and a alkylated hydrvcarbon fraction;
m) fourth conduit means ~ox convey:ing hydrocarbon from said cool-ing jacket outlet to said second fractionation means;
n) means for recycling the second isoparaffin hydrocarbon fraction from said second fractionation means lnto said second conduit means before the inlet of said mixing means for contact wi~h additional reactant hydro-carbons; and o~ m~ans for recycling acid catalys~ phase ~rom said centriPugal separation means to the inlet of said mixing means.
Advantages of the present invention include the economic savings of reduced e~ui~ment and cost and reduced power requirements for processes em~
ploying the tubular reactor apparatus as co~pared to backmixed alkylation processes employing high shear mixingO Additionally, the apparatus of the present invention enables production of alkylate of improved quality and octane value in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation processes.
These advantages and others will be described more fully in the ~ - 7a -.. , . . ~ .
~IB765~6 detaile~ description o~ the invention which follows.
The arawing is a sche~atic aiagram of an alkylation process employ-ing the improved apparatus o~ the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF q~}~E INVENTION
Alkylation processes which are to be performed in the improved ap- -paratus of the present invention are ~hose wherein isoparaffin hydrocarbons such a~ isobutane, isopentane, isohexane, etc. are alkylated with olefin hydxocarbonæ such as propylene, butylene, pentylenes, etc. Preferably, isobutane is selected as the isoparaffin reactant and olefin reactant is selected from propylene, butylenes, and mixtures thereof. Olefin hydrocar~ons .
, ~ 7 65~ ~
in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation catalysts tend to undergo polymerization reactions as well as the desirable alkylation reactions wi-~h isoparaffin hydrocarbons. In order to increase selectivity of olefin con~ersion to alky-late hydrocarbons, a substantial stoichiometic excess of isoparaffin reactant is desirable. Liquid volume ratios of isoparaffin to olefin of from about 2/1 to about 20/1 are contemplated in the present invention. Preferably, isoparaffin to olefin ratios of at least 4/1 are employed.
Reactant hydrocarbon charge ~treams normally employed in commercial alkylation processes are derived from refinery process streams and may contain small amounts of impurities such as n-butane, propane, etc. Such impurities are undesirable in large concentration as they occupy alkyla-tion reactor volume, thus decreasing reactor capacity available for the desired reactants. Conseguently, process charge streams and/or recycle streams are usually fractionated to remove a substantial portion of such paraffinic impurities.
Alkylation catalysts contemplated for use in the apparatus of the present invention comprise from about 88 weight percent to about 98 weight percent H2S04, prefer-ably from about 96 weight percent to about 88 weight per-cent H2SO4. At H2$04 concentrations above 98 weight per-cent, the rate of the alkylation reaction decreases and the octane value of alkylate product decreases. At H2SO4 concentrations below about 88 weight percent, olefin polymerization reactions increase, thus reducing the octane value of the alkylate product. For an effective alkyla-tion catalyst, some water and acid oil must be present ~8-, ., .
: . . : . .
~L~7~iS~
with th~ ~2S04 . That is, fresh H2S04 of about 98 weight percent concentration containing about 2 weight percent H20 has little activity as an alkylation catalyst, and an induction ~eriod of contact wi~h hydrocarbon reac~ant under alkylation reaction conditions is necessary to promote the catalyst activity. During this induction period, acid oils which are high molecular weight reaction produc~s of H2S0~
~and hydrocarbon reactants, are genPrated. Thus an effective alkylation catalyst will comprise from about 88-98 weight percent H2S04 t from about 1-8 weight percent ~2 and from about 1-6 weight percent acid oils. In addition, a small amount of a compound for increasing solubility of isoparaffin in sulfuric acid catalysts is helpful when using the tubular reactors of the present invention. With such sul-furic acid catalysts comprising ~2S04, H20 and acid oils, solubility of isoparaffin in the catalyst phase 1s quite low, while olefins are substantially soluble ln th0 catalyst. Consequently, in commercial processes, high shear mixing is employed such that an emulsion of hydro-carbon and acid catalyst is formed to insure contact of isoparaffin and olefin reactants in the presence of the catalyst phase. If such mixing is not provided, then isoparaffin will not effectively contact olefin absorbed in the acid catalyst and olefin will tend to polymerize rather than alkylate with such isoparaffin. Such olefin polymers produce heavy alkylate of Cg and greater carbon number having low octane value. Olefin polymers also crack in the presence of acid catalyst producing light alkylate of C5-C7 carbon number, which likewi~e has low octane value. For these reasons, sommercial alkylation _g_ .
~7~5~6 processes for alkylation of isoparaffins with olefin in the presence oE sulfuric acid have not been successful in non-back mixed, or tubular, reactors without extraneous high shear mixing to maintain hydrocarbon-acid catalyst emulsions.
However, we ha~e discovered, when solubility o isobutane in sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst is increased to about 1 volume p~rcent or more, high quality alkylate of high octane value can be produced in nonbacked mixed reactors wherein no extraneous mixing is provided.
One group of compounds which may be employed advantageously for improving solubility of isoparaffins in sulfuric acid catalyst are amphiphilic compounds which form association colloids or micelles in acid solutions.
Amphiphilic compounds are che~ical compounds the molecules of which possess distinct regions of hydrophobic and hydro-philic character. In acid solutions, aggregations of the amphiphiles form spherical micelles in which the hydropho-bic portion of the amphiphi les are located in the interior of the micelle and the hydrophilic portion of the amphiphiles' are at the surface of the micelle. The hydrophophilic portion o a micelle is ionic and/or polar whereas the hydrophobic portion is a non-polar hydxocarbon radical, preferably comprlsing a straight chain of 8 to 20~ carbon atoms. The hydrocarbon radicals, when forming the interior of the micelle, are capable of taking into solution the non-polar isopaxaffin reactants. Thus, the micelle forming amphiphilic compounds bring non-polar isoparaffin reactants into solution with the polar sulfuric acid catalysts. The -micell es formed are not static species, but rather exist in dynamic equilibrium with the associated polar and non-polar molecules. Consequently, micelles are contstantly formed and disassociated, bringing into solution with the acid catalyst and releasing it for contact with olefin reactant under condition~ favorable for alkylation reactions to proceed.
A variety of amphiphilic compounds are known to form micelles in sviution. These are of three classes:
cationic t anionic and nonionic. For use in the present invention, such amphiphilic agents must form micelles and must be reasonably stable in acid solution. Examples of - compounds which are capable of forming micelles and which are known to enhance acid catalyzed alkylation reactions include: N-(alkyl)~enzene sulfonamides; N-(alkyl) alkyl sulfonanides, alkyl sulfonium salts, alkyl phosphonium salt~, alkyl benzene sulfonic acids, aliphatic amines, and N'NN" tris (alkyl) phosphonic triamides, alkyl ammonium salts, and salts of alkyl sulfates. It has ~een ~ound necessary that such,amphiphilic compounds contain at least one aliphatic alkyl radical of 8 to 24 carbon atoms The total number of carbon atoms may be from 8 to 60.
Amphiphilic compounds which are preferred in the practice of the present invention are N-(alkyl) benzene sulonamides wherein the (alkyl) radical iS straight chain having from about 10 to 20 ¢arbon atoms, and N-(alkyl) alkyl sulfon-. .
amides wherein the (alkyl) attached to the nltrogen atom is a straight chain having from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and the alkyl radical attached to the sulfur atom is a paraffin or cyclo-paraffin radical having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. A particularly preferred amphiphilic com-pound is N-(octadecyl) benzene sulfonamide. In addition ~11-~L~76~ 6 to a capability for forming micelles in acid solution, such amphiphilic compounds in sufficient concentration tend to form emulsions of acid catalyst and hydrocarbon reactants.
Should the concentration of such amphiphilic compounds be too great, the emulsions formed are rather stable and separation of acid catalyst from hydrocarbon ~s hindered.
Rapid separation of alkylation reaction emulsion into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid phase is desirable for effec-tive processing of the hydrocarbon, for recovery of the alkylate product, and for recycle of the separated acid phase as catalyst to the alkylation reaction zone. In view of the emulsion forming tendencies of ~uch amphiphilic compounds the maximum amount of such compvunds used must be carefully controlled. Thus, not more than about 0.5 weight percent of a selected amphiphilic compound should be incorporated into a sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst in -order to avoid formation of stable hydrocarbon-acid emul-sions. Preferably, ~ot more than about 0.1 weight percent of the selected amphiphilic compound is employed with the sulfuric acid catalys~. The amoun~ of select amphiphilic compound~ must be equivalent at least about 0.0005 weight percent of the sulfuric acid catalyst in order to obtain any substantial benefit in an alkylation proce~s.
Temperatures which may be used in alkylation proce~ses performed in the apparatus of the present inven-tion are in the range from about -20C to about lOO~F.
Lower temperature~ favor alkylation reactions of i~oparaffins with olefin over competing olefin polymeriza-tior~ reactionsO However~ over all reaction rates decrease at lower temperatures. Preferred alkylation reaction ~71~5iD~;
temperatures in the range of from abou~ 40-70F, provide good selectivity for alkyla~ion of isoparaffin with olefin at an acceptable reaction rate.
Superatmospheric reaction pressures sufficient to maintain all reactants in the liquid phase are required.
Reaction pressures of from about 10 20 about 200 psig and higher may be used. Additionally, when ~he centrifugal separation device is a liquid cyclone, it is advantageous for the pressure to be sufficiently high to provide kinetic energy for separation of the reaction emulsion into a hydro-carbon phase and an acid phase. Pressures of 50-500 psig, or higher are adequate for effectin$ such phase separation in a liquid cyclone.
Residence time of reaction emulsion, comprising reactant hydrocarbons, acid catalyst and alkylate hydro-carbon in the reaction zone is commonly expressed as olefin space velocity. That is, as volumes of olefin per hour per volume o catalyst. In the present invention olefin space velocities in the range of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume o catalyst may be employed. When the volume xatio of isoparaffin to olefin is in the range of 2/1 to 20~1 and the reactant emulsion comprises 40-70 volume percent acid catalyst within this range substantially all the olefin is converted in the reaction zohe. At higher olefin space velocities~ all the olefin may not react in the reaction zone. At low-space velocities side reactions, such as cracking, may become sign1ficant. Reactants should be maintained in the r~-action zone only for a residence time sufficient for conversion of the olefi~ reactant at the selected reaction 1~765~)6 conditions. We have also discovered that the hydrocarbon pha~e comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product should be separated from the alkylation acid catalyst as soon as possible after the reaction mixtures leaves the reaction zone. A preferred embodiment of the present inven-tion incorporates means for rapid separation of the reaction effluent into hydrocarbon phase and acid phase, and with-drawal of the separated phases without prolonged contact such as is presently experienced in acid settler drums employed in presently utilized processes. That is r we have discovered that limiting contact of hydrocarbon reactant and products with acid catalyst to as nearly as possible the time required for conversion of olefin reactant substantially improves ~he quality and octane value of the alkylate product.
In the present inven~ion, a nonback mixed reactor is contemplated. Extraneous backmixing of reactants in the reaction zone is not contemplated. We have discovered, that by employing the apparatus of the present invention isoparaffin hydrocarbons may be alkylated with olefin hydro-carbons in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation alky~
lation catalyst in a nonback mixed, or tubular, reactor without high shear mixing in the reaction zone~ This result is unexpected for hereto~ore it has been experienced that high shear mixing of the reaction emulsion is required in a baakmixed reactor to maintain good contact of iso-paraffin and olefin in the presence of sulfuric acid alky-lation catalyst. Addition of selected micelle forming amphiphilic compounds, as hereinabove described, to the sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst substantially improves 765~6 contact of isoparaffin hydrocarbon witb olefin hydrocarbon in intimate contact with the sulfuric acid catalyst.
As is discussed herein, the ~lkylation reaction is much favored by establishing a xeaction emulsion com-prising reactant isoparaffin hydrocarbons suspended in a continuous sulfuric acid catalyst phase. Although in the present invention we do not contemplate the necessity of ~ -providing high shear mixing in the reaction zone to main-tain such an emulsion, we do find it necessary to charge reactants and catalysts to the reactor as such an emulsion.
Such an emulsion of isoparaffin, olefin and sulfuric acid catalyst containing an amphiphilic compound may readily be established with conventional mi~ing equipment. For example, the emulsion may be formed by charging the reac-tants and catalyst, in the desired ratios as described herein, to mixing devices such as mi.xing valves, centrifugal mixing mpumps, high shear centrifugal mixers, turbine mixers, ultrasonic mixers, and other mechanical devices suitable for mixing i~miscible liquids. A mixing valve, such as a globe valve may be used to good advantage in the present invantion. Preferably, a mixing pump is employed in the present invention. A mixing pump, such as a centrifugal pump, provides sufficient shear to form the desired hydro~
carbon in acid emulsion. Additionally, such a pump provides the head required to flow the reactant emulsion through the nonback mixed reactor at flow velocities, as described below, required to maintain the emulsion without phase separation. It is within the contemplation of the present invention that the reactant emulsion discharging ~ . .
1 ~ 65~ ~
from the mixing device, whether mixing valve, mixing pump, or other mixing device, will directly enter the reactor inlet through a minimum length of transition conduit at flow velocities sufficient to prevent any phase separation of the emulsion. Upon mixing reac-tant isoparaffin and ole-fin hydrocarbons with the sulfuric acid catalyst, the e~o-thermic alkylation will begin. Consequently, emulsion residence time within the mixing device and transition conduit must be relatively short to prevent an undesirable temperature increase before the reaction emulsion enters the refrigerated reactor. Mixing valves and mixing pumps characteristically have small holding volumes and are amenable to rather close coupling to other process equip-ment.
In the practice of our invention we use an elongated tubular reactor having inlet and outlet means.
The reactor diameter is chosen such that the Reynolds number (NRE) of the 1Owing reaction emulsion is at least about 5000 NRE and preferably is in the range of about 5000-20,000 NR~ Higher Reynolds numbers do not contri-bute substantially to the alkylation reaction. At Reynolds t numbers below about 5000 NRE, the reaction emulsion may not be maintained and the reaction emulsion may separate into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid phase.
Should separation occur, olefin conversion may be incomplete -and/or ole~in polymerization reactions may become substantial due to separation of isopa~affin reactants into a separate phase. The length of the tubular reactor is selected to provide the desired olefin space velocity in the range of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin , ~, .
65~6 per hour per volume of catalyst. Contact of reactant hydrocarbon with sulfuric acid catalyst for the minimum time re~uired for essentially complete conversion of ole-~in reactant is preferred.
Reactors in parallel may be employed according to the present invention. By using tubular reactors in parallel, an alkylation process with increased capacity may be operated without the necessity of duplicating process e~uipment collaterial to the tubular reactors.
Reaction temperatures in the range of about -20F to about 100F may be employed as hereinabove stated.
Reactants may be cooled to the desired reaction temperature prior to being introduced into the reaction zone. However, the alkylation reaction i~ exothexmie and cooling in the reaction zone must be provided to maintain the desired re-action temperature. ~xternal, indirect cooling of the tubular reaction zone is contemplated in the present inven-tion. Particularly ef~ective is the use of a cooling jacket surround the tubulax reactor. That is, a cold fluid flows as refrigerant in a jacket surrounding the tubular reactor, absorbing the heat of the alkylation reaction. In the case of several tubular reactors in parallel, a reactor configuration of the Shell and tube design may be efficiently employed. Flow of the refrigerant fluid may be co-current or countercurrent to the flow of reactant hydrocarbon.
Co-current flow will allow some increase in reaction mi~-ture temperature along the length of the reaction tube, such that the reaction kemperature is highest in the portion of the reaction tube wherein the concentration of olefin reactant is lowest. This co-current flow of refrigerant .~........
~765~6 fluid and reaction mixture, with the concomitant tempera-ture increase along the reactor length, will encourage complete conversion of olefin at low concentrations. With countercurrent flow of refrigerant fluid and reaction emulsion, temperatures along the length of the reaction zone may be maintained more nearly equal, if desired.
Refrigerant may be a refrigerant fluid separat~ly provided for the purpose, or i~ may comprise a process stream. For an example of the latter, separated hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product may be flashed under approximately adiabatic conditions at sukatmospheric pressure to vaporize a portion of the isoparaffin. The remaining, unflashed hydrocarbon liquid is cooled by the adiabatic vaporization of the isoparaffin, and this cooled liquid may be used as refrigerant fluid circulated through the cooling jacket for remo~al of the heat of reaction from the reaction zone.
Efficient transfer of heat from the reaction mix-ture to the refrigerant fluid is desirable. Particularly useful aids to the transfer of heat from the reaction emulsion to the wall o~ the reactor are static mixers.
Particularly those disclosed in U. S. Patent 3,286,992 and sold under the tradename "Kenics Mixers"O These mixers -comprise twisted ribbons of metal of substantially the same width as the diameter of the reactor tube. The twisted ribbons are arranged in a configuration which not only insures good transverse mixing of the reaction mix-ture within the reaction zone, but also transfers reaction mixture from the interior to the wall of the reaction tubel thus bringing all the reaction mixture systematically into contact with the cooled tube wall. Heat transfer ~76~ 6 ~rom a tube equipped with such static mixers i~ many times grea~er than from a tube not so e~uipped. O~her static mixers than these of the "Kenics" design are available, although, the "Kenics" mixer is the simplest of construction and has the lowest pressure drop for an equivalent degree of mixing. In addition to improve heat transfer from the tubular reactor such static mixers substantially aid maintenance of the reaction emulsion without phase separation in the reaction tube. Such sta~ic mixers, at usually encountered flow velocities, are not effective for forming an emulsion of hydrocarbon reactants in sulfuric acid catalyst, ~ut are useful for maintaining such an emulsionl once formed. The uses of such static mixers for improving heat transer from a t:ube, and for providing substantial mixing of fluids at a very low pressure drop, are well-known ar.d axe widely practiced~
In the process o f the present invention, liquid reaction emulsion affluent exitC; the tubular reaction æone at a high ~elocity required to maintai~ a Reynolds number of at least 5000 NRE in the reaction zone. The kinetic energy of the flowing effluent is utilized for obtaining rapld separation of the emulsion effluent into a hydrocarbon comprises unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate product, substantially free of acid catalyst. The separated acid phase comprises sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst and a minor amount of hydrocarbon. That is, the separated acid phase comprises about 100-70 volume percent sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst and about 0-30 volume percent hydro-carbon. Additionally, the amphiphilic compound employed ~176Sal6 with the sulfuric acid alkylation catalys~ remains in the separated acid phase. The kinetic energy of the flowing reaction effluent emulsion is utilized for separation of the hydrocarbon and sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst phases in a mechanical separation device employing centri-fugal forces, such as a liquid cyclone~ centrifuge, etc. --Liquid cyclone separation devices are particularly effective for rapidly separating the heavier acid phase from the lighter hydrocarbon phase. Such a cyclone is basically a centrifugal machine utilizing the forces of gravity for separating two immiscible fluids having different specific gravities. Such gravity force equip-ment "parts" ~he immiscible fluids by means of differences in specific gravity. Equipment using gravity force~, including cyclones, can be characteriæed by the level of the forces developed, residence time provided9 and the turbulene created. A settler~ for example, allows long residence time and gives essentially quiescent conditions.
On the other hand, liquid cyclones develop forces up to 1000 g or more, have very short residence times, and provide turbulent action.
In the case of gravity force machines, ease of separation depends upon Stokes' Laws variables; i.e., separability is directly proportional to the immiscible droplet diameter squared times the specific ~ravity differential between the immiscible fluids, and is inverssly porportional to the viscosity of the continuous fluid.
Although the relationship is valid and straight forward, the variables themselves are difficult to determine9 and if known are not directly usable. For -20~
1~765~6 instance, an emulsion may contain immiscible droplets of known size suspended in a continuous medium, however deforma-tion of the droplets may impart shapes detrimental to separability. Or, if many droplets are in suspension, they tend to collide and, hence, do not settle well. On the other hand, droplet coalescence, induced or natural, can provide a decided improvement in separability.
The effect of viscosity as a factor on separabi-lity is sometimes difficult to determine; under dynamic conditions such as occur in cyclones, viscosity can rarely be measured. For these reasons, then~ reliance must even-tually be placed upon empirical tests to resolve any given separation problem. However, cyclones for separation of solids from fluids and for separation of fluids from fluids are well-known in the art, and one skilled in the art can make a preliminary judgement as to possible cyclone application by comparing the Stokes' Law Variables of previously tested standard slurries, an the new, untested emulsions.
Such cyclone separators comprise a cyclindrical upper section attached to a conical lower sectionO The inlet stream enters the cylindrical section tangentially, so that a velocity redistribution is involved, resulting in a tangentail velocity component which increases with decreasing radius. The flow path invokes a double vortex, with downward spiraling flow at the outside and upward spiraling flow at the center. Spiral velocities may reach values several times the average velocity in the inlet section. The more dense phase of the inlet stream, by virtue of its inertia, will tend to move toward the outside .
.
1~71~5~6 wal~ and pass downward through the conical section, to be removed into a suitable receiver. The less dense phase will pass upward in the central upward spiral flow to be removed at the top of the cyclone through a tube. The centrifugal separating force, or acceleration may range fxom about 5 ~imes gravity for large, low resistance units to about 2,500 times gravity for small, high pres~ure drop units.
One advantage of such a separation device, utilizing centrifugal ~or gravity) force to separate the hydrocarbon phase from the acid phase, is the kinetic energy of the reaction zone effluent is effectively used and additional energy need not be expendedO Another ad~
vantage is, the hydrocar~on phase may be rapidly separated from the~ acid phase without an extended period of contact such as is experien~ed in a gravity settling vessel. The overall short contact time of hydrocarbon reactants, and alkylate products with sulfuric acid catalyst in a tubular reactor and centrifugal phase separator contribute materially to the good quality and high octane value of ;~
alkylate product. Undesirable side reactions which procaed at 8~ ower rates than the alkylation reaction such as cracking, isomerization, polymerization, and self-alkyla-tion reactions are minimized when contact of hydrocarbon and acid catalyst is limited to essentially the time required for conversion of essentially all the olefin reactant.
A third advankage of a mechanical separation device operating upon the principle of centxifugal separa-tion of the hydrocarbon phase and the acid catalyst phase 5~6 resides in the charac~eristic of such devices which allows the dagree of separation to be closely controlled and varied within a substantial range. That is, by selection of a properly si~ed separation device for the expected flow of reaction effluent, ~he hydrocarbon phase may be recovered subs*antially fxee of acid catalyst and the acid phase may be recovared with a controlled hydrocarbon content. For instance, a liquid cyclone is operated such that hydrocarbon phase is withdrawn substantially free of acid, and acid phase is withdrawn at rate to prevent accumulation of acid phase in the cyclone. The rate of acid phase withdrawal may be adjusted to withdraw a volume equivalent only to the volume of acid catalyst entering the cyclone, in which the hydrocarbon content of the acid phase will be quite low, in the range of 0-2 volume percent. Or, if desired, the rate of acid phase withdrawal may be :;ncreased to a value some-what greater than the volume of acid catalyst entering the cyclone in which event the hydrocarbon content of the acid phase will be increased, in the range of 2~30 volume per-cent. The operation of a sulfuric acid catalyzed alkyla-tion process is substantially improved when acid catalyst phase entering the reaction zone contains a minor portion of hydrocarbon, in the range of 0-30 volume percent and preferably in the range of 3-8 volume percentO The presence of such hydrocarbon in the acid phase improves emulsification of acid phase and hydrocarbon reactants t causing the desired alkylation reactions to predominate over undesired side reactions. By using separation devices operating upon the principle of centrifugal separation of the phases, the hydrocarbon content of the ~eparated acid phase, which is recycled within the alkylation process, may ~6~i~6 be easily controlled within the desired range.
In operating of such separation devices as described above, we have discovered that separation of acid phase from the hydrocarbon phase can be substantially improved if the reaction emulsion entering the separation device has a hydrocarbon continuous phase wi~h acid catalyst entrained there~in. That is, hydrocarbon phase substantially free of acid catalyst is more easily separated from an emulsion wherein thP hydrocarbon phase is continuous with small drop-lets of acid catalyst suspended therein. However, for efficient alkylation of isoparaffin with olefin in a tubular reactor, an emulsion comprising acid catalyst continuous phase is preferred. Acid catalyst continuous phase emulsions with isoparaffin and olefin hydrocarbons which are useful in alkylation reactions may comprise about 40-70 volume percent acid catalystr We have found that such reaction zone emulsion effluents may readily be converted from acid phase continuous emulsions to hydrocarbon phase continuous emul-sions by dilution of the emulsion with additional hydrocarbon to obtain diluted emulsion. Comprising 60 volume perc~nt or more hydrocarbon phase. In the process of the present in-vention, dilution of the reaction zone effluent emulsion is effectively accomplished by circulating a portion o~ the separated hydrocarbon phase from the outlet of the separa-tion device for contact with reaction zone effluent emulsion at the inlet of said separation device. By this means an acid phase continuous reaction emulsion may be maintained in the reaction zone, and at the re~ction zone outlet the emulsion effluent may be converted to an emulsion with a continuous hydrocarbon phase for more efficient separation.
-2~-, 5~6 Hydrocarbon phase from the separation device com-prises unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydro-carbon product. This separated hydrocarbon phase may be taken directly to a fractionation zone for recovery of iso-butane and alkylate hydrocarbonO Preferably, however, the separated hydrocarbon phase is employed to cool the reaction zone to a desired operating temperature. For cooling, the separated hydrocarbon phase from the separation device is passed through a pressure reducing means such that a substantial portion of the isoparaffin hydrocarbon is flash vaporized under conditions approaching adiabatic and the remaining unvaporized hydrocarbon i5 thereby cooled to a temperature sufficient to cool the reaction zone. The cold hydrocarbon li~uid is then prefe:rably passed in indirect heat exchange with the reaction emulsion in the reaction zone~ Preferably, the separated hydrocarbon phase is partially vaporized at subatmosp]heric pressure such that the remaining unvaporized hydrocarbon liquid has a tempera-ture sufficiently low to insure cooling of the reaction emulsion. Conveniently, subatmospheric pressures may be obtained by such means as vacuum pumps, etc, The vaporized hydrocarbon, which is substantially all iso-paraffin, may be condensed and recycled to the inlet of the reaction zone for contack with additional olefin reactant and acid catalyst. The unvaporized hydrocarbon, after being employed to cool the reaction zone, may then be passed into a product recovery zone wherein isoparaffin is separated from alkylate product. Isoparaffin from the product recovery zone may be recycled to the inlet of the reaction zone~for contact with additional reactant hydro--25~
ii561 ~
carbon.
Separated acid phase from the centrifugal device is preferably recycled as catalyst to the inlet of the re-action zone for contact with additional olefin and iso~
paraffin reactant. In a continuous process, as acid strength of the alkylation catalyst declines and as water and acid oil impurities increase, a portion of the recycle acid catalyst may be withdrawn from the process and fresh su~furic acid added to maintain sulfuric acid content of the acid catalyst in the range of about 98-88 weight percentO
In order to better des~ribe the present invention attention is now drawn to the appended drawing. The drawing is a schematic diagram of alkylation process e~uip-ment embodying the improvements of the present invention.
The drawing, and the detailed description which follows are intended to be illustrative of the invention only, and not intended to llmit the scope of the invention which is described in the appended claims.
In the drawing, isoparaffin from line 2 and 3~ !
as will hereinafter be described, is combined in line 1 with olefin feed from line 6 in an isoparaffin olefin volume ratio in the range of 2/1 to 20/1. The isoparaffin olefin mixture from line 1 is cooled in cooler 4, and pa3ses inko mixer 5~ Sulfuric acid catalyst from line 7 also enters mixer 5. In mixer 5, isoparaffin, olefin, and acid catalyst are mixed to form an emulsion comprising about 40-7b volume percent of a continuous acid catalyst phase, containing about 98-88 weight percent sulfuric acid and from about 0.0005 to about 0.5 weight percent of a micelle forminy amphiphilic agent and about 60-30 volume , ,:
. ' ' , ' ' . ' -J~7~S~6 percent of discontinuous hydrocarbon phase. Olefin, being somewhat soluble in the acid phase, is distributed between the hydrocarbon and acid phase. From mixer 5 the emulsion passes via line 8 into tubular reactor 9 through which the reaction emulsion flows with substantially no backmixing.
In reactor 9 the emulsion flows at a Reynolds number of at least 5000 NRE or a residence time sufficient to provide an olefin space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 1 volumes olefin per hour per volume of alkylation catalyst (v/v/hr). Temperature of the reaction emulsion is main-tained at a selected temperature of from about -20F to about 100F and at a superatmospheric pressure of about 50 psig to about 20 psig sufficient to maintain all reactants in the liquid phase and provide kinetic energy for separating hydrocarbon phase from acid phase in centri-fugal separation device 11, as will hereinafter be described.
From reactor 9, reaction emulsion effluent is transferred via line 10 to centrifugal separator 11. Advantageously, for sepaxation of the phases, hydrocarbon from line 24 is mixed with reaction emulsion effluent in line 10 to produce a mixture comprising 40-70 volume percent hydrocarbon phase 60-30 volume percent acid phase, wherein the hydro-carbon phase is continuous.
In the drawin~ the hydrocarbon-acid catalyst emulsion from lin~ 10 enters cen~rifugal separator 11, wherein hydrocarbon phase is separated from acid phase by application of centrifugal force to the emulsion. Upon separation, the phases are rapidly removed from centrifugal separator 11 to avoid contact of hydrocarbon with acid catalyst under conditions which promote side reactions ... ~ .
~7650~i such as cracking and isomerization.
In the drawing, separated hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate hydrocarbon passes through line 12 and pressure reducing means 13 into flash drum 14. In flash drum 14, a portion of the hydro-carbon phase is flashed at subatmopsheric pxessure under about adiabatic conditions, thereby cooling the unflashed portion of the hydrocarbon liquid to a temperature below the selected reaction tempera~ure to be maintained in reactor 9. From flash arum 14, vaporized hydrocarbon, comprising unreacted isoparaffin as a major component, passes through line 16 and compressor 17 into condensor 18 wher~in the hydrocarbon vapor is condensed. From condensor 18, hydrocarbon is charged via line 19 to fractionation column 20 wherein hdyrocarbons lower boiling than the isoparaffin hydrocarbon, which may have entered the process as charge stream impurities or be the products of unwanted side reactions, are separated from the isoparaffin hydro-carbon. Such lower boiling hydrocarbons are withdrawn from fractionation GOlUmn 20 via line 21. Isoparaf~in hydro-carbon substantially free of lower boiling hydrocarbon is returned to the process for contact wlth additional ol~fin via line 2 as~ hereinabove described.
In the drawing, acid catalyst phase separated from the hydrocarbon phase is centrifugal separator ll, is recycled via line 7 to mixer 5 for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactants, as hereinabove described.
Such recycle acid phase consis~s of about 70-100 volume percent of acid alkylation catalyst and about 30-0 volume percent entrained hydrocarbon. The acid alkylation .
-~1~76~i~6 catalyst comprises about 98-88 weight percent sulfuric acid, about 1-8 weight percent water, about 1-6 weight percent acid oil, and contains from about 0.005 to about 0.5 weight percent of a selected micelle forming amphiphilic agent.
Impurities, such as excess water and acid oils are removed from the alkylation process by withdrawing a portion of the recycle acid phase as spent acid, from line 7 via line 23.
Fresh acid, comprising 99.5-97 weight percent H2SO4 , and containing about 0.0005 to 0.5 weight percent of a micelle forming amphiphilic agent is added to the acid recycle via line 22. This fresh acid is makeup for the volume of spent acid removed, and sexves to maintain acid catalyst H2SO4 concentration within the desired range.
In the drawing, cold hydrocarbon liquid, comprising isoparaffin and alkylate, from flash drum 14 is passed via line 25 into cooling jacket 26 which surrounds tubular reactor 9. The cold hydrocarbon liquid comprises unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon.
In cooling j acket 26, the exothermic heat from the alkyla-tion reaction is transferred through the walls of reactor 9 into the cold hydrocarbon, thus maintaining the tempera-ture of the reaction emulsion within the dssired tempera-ture range. After apsorbing heat from reactor~9, hydro-carbon stre~m absorbs additional heat from the lsoparaffin-olefin stream in cooler 4, as hereinabove described.
In the drawing, from cooler 4 the hydrocarbon stream passes via line 28 to caustic wash zone 29 wherein any entrained acid is neutralized by reaction with caustic solution and from caustic wash zone 29 the mixture of hydrocarbon and caustic solution passes via line 30 into , ~ ' : '' : ' caustic settler 30 wherein the mix~ure separates by gravity ~ettling into a hydrocarbon phase and a caustic phase.
Hydrocarbon phase from caustic se~tler 31 passes via line 32 into water wash zone 33 wherein the hydrocarbon phase is contacted with water for removal of any entrained caustic.
From water wash ~one 33, the hydrocarbon-water mixture passes via line 34 to water settler 35 wherein hydrocarbon is separated from water phase by gravity settling. From water settler 35, hydrocarbon passes via line 36 into product fractionation column 37.
In the drawing, isoparaffin feed, to makeup for tha~ consumed in the processes, enters product ~ractionation column 37 via line 38. In column 37 the water washed hydroc~rbon from line 36 and fresh isoparaffin feed are fractionated into an isoparaffin fraction, a normal paraffin fraction having the same molecular weight as the isoparaffin, and an alkylate fractionO The isoparaffin fraction passes from product fractionation column 37 via line 3 into line 1, as hereinabove described~ for mixture with the isoparaffin stream from line 2. The noramal paraffin fraction, of the same molecular weight as the isoparaffin, is withdrawn from product fractionation column 37 via line 39. The alkylate product fract~on,comprising hydrocarbons of molecular weight greater than the isoparaffin~ and having a high octane value~ is withdrawn from product fractionation column 37 via line 40 for transfer to gasoline blending facilities, not shown.
~6S~6 This example illustrates operation of an alkyla-tion process employing apparatus of the present invention.
Hydrocarbon charge mixture, comprising olefin hydrocarbon, fresh isobutane charge and recycle isobutane, having the composition shown in Table 1 below, is mixed in a centrifugal pump at a rate of 539 bbl/hr. with recycle catalyst emulsion comprising about 8.4 volume percent hydrocarbon and about 91.6 volume percent acid catalyst to form a xeaction emulsion comprising 60-62 volume percent acid catalyst.
The acid catalyst comprises about 94 weight per-cent sulfuric acid, about 2 weight percent water, about 4 weight percent acid oil, and contains O . 015 weight percent of the micelle forming amphiphilic compound N-(octadecyl) benzene sulfonamide.
The reaction emulsion is charged to a tubular -reactor cooled by indirect heat exchange with a refrigerant fluid, said tubular reactor having a diameter of six inches and a length of 197 feet. Reaction conditions within the tubular reactor include reactor inlet temperature of 43F, reactor outlet temperature of 47~F, and reaction emulsion ..
residence time of 30 seconds to provide an olefin space velocity of about 0.60 volumes olefin per hour per vo1ume ;~
of acid catalyst. The reaction emulsion is flowed;through the tubular reactor at a rate such that the average Reynolds numher is 8350 NRE. This Reynolds number is well within the turbulent range, thus the reaction emulsion is maintained throughout the length of the tubular reactor without separation of the phase. Reaction effluent from ..
~L~765~6 the tubular reactor outlet is mixed wi~h about 500 bbls.
per hour of recycle isobutane for conversion of the emulsion from a hydrocarbon in continuous acid phase emulsion to an acid in continuous hydrocarbon phase emulsion which is then passed directly into a 24 inch diameter liquid cyclone for separation into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid catalyst phase. The acid catalyst phase is recycled to the tubular reactor inlet for contact with additional hydrocarbon reactants. About two bbls/hr. of fresh 9B weight percent sulfuric acid is added to the recycle acid stream to main-tain the acid concentration therein~ and a concomitant amount of acid phase is withdrawn as spent acid.
T A B_L E
_ SITION _ _ _ _ _ COMPONENTVOLUME PERCENT
C2= 0.7 C3 0.1 C3 4.3 i-C4 81.0 n-C4 4.0 i-C4= 5,0 ~C~= 4.3 i-C5
ii561 ~
carbon.
Separated acid phase from the centrifugal device is preferably recycled as catalyst to the inlet of the re-action zone for contact with additional olefin and iso~
paraffin reactant. In a continuous process, as acid strength of the alkylation catalyst declines and as water and acid oil impurities increase, a portion of the recycle acid catalyst may be withdrawn from the process and fresh su~furic acid added to maintain sulfuric acid content of the acid catalyst in the range of about 98-88 weight percentO
In order to better des~ribe the present invention attention is now drawn to the appended drawing. The drawing is a schematic diagram of alkylation process e~uip-ment embodying the improvements of the present invention.
The drawing, and the detailed description which follows are intended to be illustrative of the invention only, and not intended to llmit the scope of the invention which is described in the appended claims.
In the drawing, isoparaffin from line 2 and 3~ !
as will hereinafter be described, is combined in line 1 with olefin feed from line 6 in an isoparaffin olefin volume ratio in the range of 2/1 to 20/1. The isoparaffin olefin mixture from line 1 is cooled in cooler 4, and pa3ses inko mixer 5~ Sulfuric acid catalyst from line 7 also enters mixer 5. In mixer 5, isoparaffin, olefin, and acid catalyst are mixed to form an emulsion comprising about 40-7b volume percent of a continuous acid catalyst phase, containing about 98-88 weight percent sulfuric acid and from about 0.0005 to about 0.5 weight percent of a micelle forminy amphiphilic agent and about 60-30 volume , ,:
. ' ' , ' ' . ' -J~7~S~6 percent of discontinuous hydrocarbon phase. Olefin, being somewhat soluble in the acid phase, is distributed between the hydrocarbon and acid phase. From mixer 5 the emulsion passes via line 8 into tubular reactor 9 through which the reaction emulsion flows with substantially no backmixing.
In reactor 9 the emulsion flows at a Reynolds number of at least 5000 NRE or a residence time sufficient to provide an olefin space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 1 volumes olefin per hour per volume of alkylation catalyst (v/v/hr). Temperature of the reaction emulsion is main-tained at a selected temperature of from about -20F to about 100F and at a superatmospheric pressure of about 50 psig to about 20 psig sufficient to maintain all reactants in the liquid phase and provide kinetic energy for separating hydrocarbon phase from acid phase in centri-fugal separation device 11, as will hereinafter be described.
From reactor 9, reaction emulsion effluent is transferred via line 10 to centrifugal separator 11. Advantageously, for sepaxation of the phases, hydrocarbon from line 24 is mixed with reaction emulsion effluent in line 10 to produce a mixture comprising 40-70 volume percent hydrocarbon phase 60-30 volume percent acid phase, wherein the hydro-carbon phase is continuous.
In the drawin~ the hydrocarbon-acid catalyst emulsion from lin~ 10 enters cen~rifugal separator 11, wherein hydrocarbon phase is separated from acid phase by application of centrifugal force to the emulsion. Upon separation, the phases are rapidly removed from centrifugal separator 11 to avoid contact of hydrocarbon with acid catalyst under conditions which promote side reactions ... ~ .
~7650~i such as cracking and isomerization.
In the drawing, separated hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin and alkylate hydrocarbon passes through line 12 and pressure reducing means 13 into flash drum 14. In flash drum 14, a portion of the hydro-carbon phase is flashed at subatmopsheric pxessure under about adiabatic conditions, thereby cooling the unflashed portion of the hydrocarbon liquid to a temperature below the selected reaction tempera~ure to be maintained in reactor 9. From flash arum 14, vaporized hydrocarbon, comprising unreacted isoparaffin as a major component, passes through line 16 and compressor 17 into condensor 18 wher~in the hydrocarbon vapor is condensed. From condensor 18, hydrocarbon is charged via line 19 to fractionation column 20 wherein hdyrocarbons lower boiling than the isoparaffin hydrocarbon, which may have entered the process as charge stream impurities or be the products of unwanted side reactions, are separated from the isoparaffin hydro-carbon. Such lower boiling hydrocarbons are withdrawn from fractionation GOlUmn 20 via line 21. Isoparaf~in hydro-carbon substantially free of lower boiling hydrocarbon is returned to the process for contact wlth additional ol~fin via line 2 as~ hereinabove described.
In the drawing, acid catalyst phase separated from the hydrocarbon phase is centrifugal separator ll, is recycled via line 7 to mixer 5 for contact with additional isoparaffin and olefin reactants, as hereinabove described.
Such recycle acid phase consis~s of about 70-100 volume percent of acid alkylation catalyst and about 30-0 volume percent entrained hydrocarbon. The acid alkylation .
-~1~76~i~6 catalyst comprises about 98-88 weight percent sulfuric acid, about 1-8 weight percent water, about 1-6 weight percent acid oil, and contains from about 0.005 to about 0.5 weight percent of a selected micelle forming amphiphilic agent.
Impurities, such as excess water and acid oils are removed from the alkylation process by withdrawing a portion of the recycle acid phase as spent acid, from line 7 via line 23.
Fresh acid, comprising 99.5-97 weight percent H2SO4 , and containing about 0.0005 to 0.5 weight percent of a micelle forming amphiphilic agent is added to the acid recycle via line 22. This fresh acid is makeup for the volume of spent acid removed, and sexves to maintain acid catalyst H2SO4 concentration within the desired range.
In the drawing, cold hydrocarbon liquid, comprising isoparaffin and alkylate, from flash drum 14 is passed via line 25 into cooling jacket 26 which surrounds tubular reactor 9. The cold hydrocarbon liquid comprises unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon.
In cooling j acket 26, the exothermic heat from the alkyla-tion reaction is transferred through the walls of reactor 9 into the cold hydrocarbon, thus maintaining the tempera-ture of the reaction emulsion within the dssired tempera-ture range. After apsorbing heat from reactor~9, hydro-carbon stre~m absorbs additional heat from the lsoparaffin-olefin stream in cooler 4, as hereinabove described.
In the drawing, from cooler 4 the hydrocarbon stream passes via line 28 to caustic wash zone 29 wherein any entrained acid is neutralized by reaction with caustic solution and from caustic wash zone 29 the mixture of hydrocarbon and caustic solution passes via line 30 into , ~ ' : '' : ' caustic settler 30 wherein the mix~ure separates by gravity ~ettling into a hydrocarbon phase and a caustic phase.
Hydrocarbon phase from caustic se~tler 31 passes via line 32 into water wash zone 33 wherein the hydrocarbon phase is contacted with water for removal of any entrained caustic.
From water wash ~one 33, the hydrocarbon-water mixture passes via line 34 to water settler 35 wherein hydrocarbon is separated from water phase by gravity settling. From water settler 35, hydrocarbon passes via line 36 into product fractionation column 37.
In the drawing, isoparaffin feed, to makeup for tha~ consumed in the processes, enters product ~ractionation column 37 via line 38. In column 37 the water washed hydroc~rbon from line 36 and fresh isoparaffin feed are fractionated into an isoparaffin fraction, a normal paraffin fraction having the same molecular weight as the isoparaffin, and an alkylate fractionO The isoparaffin fraction passes from product fractionation column 37 via line 3 into line 1, as hereinabove described~ for mixture with the isoparaffin stream from line 2. The noramal paraffin fraction, of the same molecular weight as the isoparaffin, is withdrawn from product fractionation column 37 via line 39. The alkylate product fract~on,comprising hydrocarbons of molecular weight greater than the isoparaffin~ and having a high octane value~ is withdrawn from product fractionation column 37 via line 40 for transfer to gasoline blending facilities, not shown.
~6S~6 This example illustrates operation of an alkyla-tion process employing apparatus of the present invention.
Hydrocarbon charge mixture, comprising olefin hydrocarbon, fresh isobutane charge and recycle isobutane, having the composition shown in Table 1 below, is mixed in a centrifugal pump at a rate of 539 bbl/hr. with recycle catalyst emulsion comprising about 8.4 volume percent hydrocarbon and about 91.6 volume percent acid catalyst to form a xeaction emulsion comprising 60-62 volume percent acid catalyst.
The acid catalyst comprises about 94 weight per-cent sulfuric acid, about 2 weight percent water, about 4 weight percent acid oil, and contains O . 015 weight percent of the micelle forming amphiphilic compound N-(octadecyl) benzene sulfonamide.
The reaction emulsion is charged to a tubular -reactor cooled by indirect heat exchange with a refrigerant fluid, said tubular reactor having a diameter of six inches and a length of 197 feet. Reaction conditions within the tubular reactor include reactor inlet temperature of 43F, reactor outlet temperature of 47~F, and reaction emulsion ..
residence time of 30 seconds to provide an olefin space velocity of about 0.60 volumes olefin per hour per vo1ume ;~
of acid catalyst. The reaction emulsion is flowed;through the tubular reactor at a rate such that the average Reynolds numher is 8350 NRE. This Reynolds number is well within the turbulent range, thus the reaction emulsion is maintained throughout the length of the tubular reactor without separation of the phase. Reaction effluent from ..
~L~765~6 the tubular reactor outlet is mixed wi~h about 500 bbls.
per hour of recycle isobutane for conversion of the emulsion from a hydrocarbon in continuous acid phase emulsion to an acid in continuous hydrocarbon phase emulsion which is then passed directly into a 24 inch diameter liquid cyclone for separation into a hydrocarbon phase and an acid catalyst phase. The acid catalyst phase is recycled to the tubular reactor inlet for contact with additional hydrocarbon reactants. About two bbls/hr. of fresh 9B weight percent sulfuric acid is added to the recycle acid stream to main-tain the acid concentration therein~ and a concomitant amount of acid phase is withdrawn as spent acid.
T A B_L E
_ SITION _ _ _ _ _ COMPONENTVOLUME PERCENT
C2= 0.7 C3 0.1 C3 4.3 i-C4 81.0 n-C4 4.0 i-C4= 5,0 ~C~= 4.3 i-C5
-3~-The separated hydrocarbon phase is fractionated to yield 100 bbl/hour of a stabilized alkylate product having the properties shown in Table 2 below.
T A B L E
ALKYI~TE PRODUCT PROPE~TIES
GR~VITY 70 . 6 Composition ~C - Weight Perc~nt c4-c5 11.3 C6-C7 7. 1 : :
C8 72.9 Cg+ 8.7 RON (clear~ 97.0 MON (clear) 93.4 , ! ~
The foregoing descriptions and example have illustrated improved apparatus for use in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of isoparaffin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocarbons wherein the alkylation reaction is carried out in a nonhack mixed rea~tor, wherein minor amounts of micelle forming amphiphilic compounds are present in the .
acid catalyst, and wherein reactant and product hydrocarbon are contacted fox only a limited time to produce increased yields to alkylate hydrocarbon having high octane value.
It will be apparent that variations and modifications of our process and apparatus included within the scope of the present invention can be similarly employed in the procedures illustrated in the example. Similarly, other isoparaffin and olefin reactants, and other amphiphilic ~L~76~6 compounds can be employ2d, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art, i~ is not intended to limit the fore-going disclosure to the particular features shown.
,~
~ ~ .
~ -34- 1
T A B L E
ALKYI~TE PRODUCT PROPE~TIES
GR~VITY 70 . 6 Composition ~C - Weight Perc~nt c4-c5 11.3 C6-C7 7. 1 : :
C8 72.9 Cg+ 8.7 RON (clear~ 97.0 MON (clear) 93.4 , ! ~
The foregoing descriptions and example have illustrated improved apparatus for use in sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation of isoparaffin hydrocarbon with olefin hydrocarbons wherein the alkylation reaction is carried out in a nonhack mixed rea~tor, wherein minor amounts of micelle forming amphiphilic compounds are present in the .
acid catalyst, and wherein reactant and product hydrocarbon are contacted fox only a limited time to produce increased yields to alkylate hydrocarbon having high octane value.
It will be apparent that variations and modifications of our process and apparatus included within the scope of the present invention can be similarly employed in the procedures illustrated in the example. Similarly, other isoparaffin and olefin reactants, and other amphiphilic ~L~76~6 compounds can be employ2d, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art, i~ is not intended to limit the fore-going disclosure to the particular features shown.
,~
~ ~ .
~ -34- 1
Claims (3)
1. Apparatus for alkylating isoparrafin hydro-carbon with olefin hydrocarbon, in the liquid phase, in the presence of sulfuric acid alkylation catalyst without high shear mixing in the reactor, which apparatus comprises:
a) mixing means outside the reactor for forming an emulsion of isoparaffin and olefin reactants and sulfuric acid catalyst;
b) a non-backmix tubular reactor, having an inlet end, an outlet end and a tubular wall, the inlet of which is in communication with said mixing means, for maintaining the emulsion effluent from said mixing means at alkylation reaction conditions, including a selected temperature of from about -20°F to about 100°F, an olefin space velocity of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume of acid catalyst, and a Reynolds number for said flowing emulsion of at least about 5000 NRE;
c) liquid cyclone centrifugal separation means having an inlet in communication with the outlet of said tubular reactor and having a hydrocarbon outlet and an acid catalyst outlet, for rapidly separating reaction emulsion effluent into a liquid hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon product, and an acid catalyst phase comprising about 70-100 volume percent acid catalyst and about 30-0 volume percent entrained hydrocarbon;
d) a cooling jacket having inlet and outlet means, surrounding said tubular reactor, defining a confined path for the flow of a refrigerant fluid;
e) a flash drum having an inlet, a top vapor outlet and a bottom liquid outlet, for adiabatically flashing said separated liquid hydrocarbon phase into a hydrocarbon vapor phase and a cooled unvaporized hydrocarbon phase;
f) first conduit means for conveying separated liquid hydrocarbon phase from said centrifugal separation means to the inlet of said flash drum;
g) a gas compressor, in communication with the top vapor outlet of said flash drum for withdrawing said hydrocarbon vapor phase from said flash drum at a subatmospheric pressure;
h) condensing means in communication with said gas compressor discharge for condensing hydrocarbon vapor from said gas compressor;
i) first fractionation means, in communication with said condensing means, for fractionating condensed hydrocarbon vapor into a first isoparaffin fraction and a fraction lighter than the first isoparaffin fraction;
j) second conduit means for conveying said first isoparaffin fraction from said first fractionation means to said mixing means;
k) third conduit means for conveying said cooled, unvaporized hydrocarbon phase from said flash drum to said cooling jacket inlet;
l) second fractionation means for fractionating hydrocarbon effluent from said cooling jacket into a second isoparaffin fraction, a normal paraffin fraction, and a alkylated hydrocarbon fraction;
m) fourth conduit means for conveying hydrocarbon from said cooling jacket outlet to said second fractionation means;
n) means for recycling the second isoparaffin hydrocarbon fraction from said second fractionation means into said second conduit means before the inlet of said mixing means for contact with additional reactant hydro-carbons; and o) means for recycling acid catalyst phase from said centrifugal separation means to the inlet of said mixing means.
a) mixing means outside the reactor for forming an emulsion of isoparaffin and olefin reactants and sulfuric acid catalyst;
b) a non-backmix tubular reactor, having an inlet end, an outlet end and a tubular wall, the inlet of which is in communication with said mixing means, for maintaining the emulsion effluent from said mixing means at alkylation reaction conditions, including a selected temperature of from about -20°F to about 100°F, an olefin space velocity of from about 0.05 to about 1.0 volumes olefin per hour per volume of acid catalyst, and a Reynolds number for said flowing emulsion of at least about 5000 NRE;
c) liquid cyclone centrifugal separation means having an inlet in communication with the outlet of said tubular reactor and having a hydrocarbon outlet and an acid catalyst outlet, for rapidly separating reaction emulsion effluent into a liquid hydrocarbon phase comprising unreacted isoparaffin hydrocarbon and alkylate hydrocarbon product, and an acid catalyst phase comprising about 70-100 volume percent acid catalyst and about 30-0 volume percent entrained hydrocarbon;
d) a cooling jacket having inlet and outlet means, surrounding said tubular reactor, defining a confined path for the flow of a refrigerant fluid;
e) a flash drum having an inlet, a top vapor outlet and a bottom liquid outlet, for adiabatically flashing said separated liquid hydrocarbon phase into a hydrocarbon vapor phase and a cooled unvaporized hydrocarbon phase;
f) first conduit means for conveying separated liquid hydrocarbon phase from said centrifugal separation means to the inlet of said flash drum;
g) a gas compressor, in communication with the top vapor outlet of said flash drum for withdrawing said hydrocarbon vapor phase from said flash drum at a subatmospheric pressure;
h) condensing means in communication with said gas compressor discharge for condensing hydrocarbon vapor from said gas compressor;
i) first fractionation means, in communication with said condensing means, for fractionating condensed hydrocarbon vapor into a first isoparaffin fraction and a fraction lighter than the first isoparaffin fraction;
j) second conduit means for conveying said first isoparaffin fraction from said first fractionation means to said mixing means;
k) third conduit means for conveying said cooled, unvaporized hydrocarbon phase from said flash drum to said cooling jacket inlet;
l) second fractionation means for fractionating hydrocarbon effluent from said cooling jacket into a second isoparaffin fraction, a normal paraffin fraction, and a alkylated hydrocarbon fraction;
m) fourth conduit means for conveying hydrocarbon from said cooling jacket outlet to said second fractionation means;
n) means for recycling the second isoparaffin hydrocarbon fraction from said second fractionation means into said second conduit means before the inlet of said mixing means for contact with additional reactant hydro-carbons; and o) means for recycling acid catalyst phase from said centrifugal separation means to the inlet of said mixing means.
2. The apparatus of Claim 1, including:
p) fifth conduit means for introducing olefin feed into said second conduit means;
q) indirect heat exchange means for exchanging heat from olefin feed, first isoparaffin fraction and second isoparaffin fraction in said second conduit to the liquid hydrocarbon fraction in said fourth conduit means; and r) means for removing any sulfuric acid from the liquid hydrocarbon fraction in said fourth conduit means, after said indirect heat exchange means and before said second fractionation means.
p) fifth conduit means for introducing olefin feed into said second conduit means;
q) indirect heat exchange means for exchanging heat from olefin feed, first isoparaffin fraction and second isoparaffin fraction in said second conduit to the liquid hydrocarbon fraction in said fourth conduit means; and r) means for removing any sulfuric acid from the liquid hydrocarbon fraction in said fourth conduit means, after said indirect heat exchange means and before said second fractionation means.
3. The apparatus of Claim 2, wherein the mixing means is a centrifugal pump.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US05/515,942 US4017263A (en) | 1974-10-18 | 1974-10-18 | Apparatus for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation process |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1076506A true CA1076506A (en) | 1980-04-29 |
Family
ID=24053435
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA234,634A Expired CA1076506A (en) | 1974-10-18 | 1975-08-29 | Apparatus for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation process |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4017263A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1076506A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8269057B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2012-09-18 | H R D Corporation | System and process for alkylation |
Families Citing this family (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2202166B (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1991-07-03 | Atomic Energy Authority Uk | Liquid-liquid contacting apparatus |
| IT1224640B (en) * | 1987-11-20 | 1990-10-18 | Vittorio Ragaini | PROCEDURE FOR THE REALIZATION OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS IN POLYPHASIC SYSTEMS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT. |
| US5443799A (en) * | 1993-08-03 | 1995-08-22 | Orgral International Technologies Corporation | Process for the alkylation of olefins and apparatus for carrying out this process and others |
| US5707923A (en) * | 1995-05-01 | 1998-01-13 | Stratco, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for controlling an alkylation process |
| FR2773496B1 (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2000-03-03 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | METHOD OF SEPARATION BY DECANTATION IN SEVERAL DISTINCT AREAS |
| CA2400258C (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2005-01-11 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Bituminous froth inclined plate separator and hydrocarbon cyclone treatment process |
| US7736501B2 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2010-06-15 | Suncor Energy Inc. | System and process for concentrating hydrocarbons in a bitumen feed |
| JP2009507629A (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2009-02-26 | ディーエスエム アイピー アセッツ ビー．ブイ． | Continuous chemical methods in centrifugal contact separators. |
| CA2827237C (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2016-02-09 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Mobile oil sands mining system |
| US8168071B2 (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2012-05-01 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process and apparatus for treating a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock |
| CA2526336C (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2013-09-17 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Method and apparatus for oil sands ore mining |
| US7491856B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2009-02-17 | H R D Corporation | Method of making alkylene glycols |
| US8304584B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2012-11-06 | H R D Corporation | Method of making alkylene glycols |
| US8278494B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2012-10-02 | H R D Corporation | Method of making linear alkylbenzenes |
| US20100204964A1 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2010-08-12 | Utah State University | Lidar-assisted multi-image matching for 3-d model and sensor pose refinement |
| CA2689021C (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2015-03-03 | Thomas Charles Hann | Apparatus and method for regulating flow through a pumpbox |
| CN115138302B (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2023-05-26 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Liquid acid alkylation reaction process and reaction system |
Family Cites Families (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2536515A (en) * | 1948-09-28 | 1951-01-02 | Socony Vacuum Oil Co Inc | Alkylation of hydrocarbons |
| US2714116A (en) * | 1950-03-31 | 1955-07-26 | Texaco Development Corp | Hydrocarbon synthesis with catalyst of less than one micron |
| US3281213A (en) * | 1963-02-18 | 1966-10-25 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Alkylation apparatus |
| FR1397150A (en) * | 1963-07-23 | 1965-04-30 | Seven E Corp | Device for a disabled person to stand up and walk |
| NL129251C (en) * | 1964-01-24 | 1970-07-15 | ||
| US3234301A (en) * | 1964-07-28 | 1966-02-08 | Texaco Inc | Sulfuric acid recovery process |
| US3456033A (en) * | 1967-02-28 | 1969-07-15 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Alkylation process utilizing an aircooled reactor |
| US3485893A (en) * | 1967-06-09 | 1969-12-23 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Alkylation process and vessel combining reaction,catalyst separation and coalescence therein |
| US3489680A (en) * | 1967-10-30 | 1970-01-13 | Mobil Oil Corp | Method for breaking a water-in-oil emulsion |
| US3639372A (en) * | 1968-06-24 | 1972-02-01 | Dow Chemical Co | Method for the polymerization of alkenyl aromatic monomers |
| US3697230A (en) * | 1969-04-21 | 1972-10-10 | Asahi Chemical Ind | Apparatus for polymerizing liquids to polymers |
| US3701793A (en) * | 1969-12-31 | 1972-10-31 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Method of carrying out liquid gas reactions |
| DE2141770A1 (en) * | 1971-08-20 | 1973-03-08 | Huels Chemische Werke Ag | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF POLYMERIZED OR COPOLYMERIZED BY VINYL CHLORIDE BY CONTINUOUS BULK POLYMERIZATION |
| US3855344A (en) * | 1973-02-02 | 1974-12-17 | E Jones | Isobutane flashing in the alkylation of c{11 {14 c{11 {0 olefin hydrocarbons with isobutane |
-
1974
- 1974-10-18 US US05/515,942 patent/US4017263A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1975
- 1975-08-29 CA CA234,634A patent/CA1076506A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8269057B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2012-09-18 | H R D Corporation | System and process for alkylation |
| US8461408B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2013-06-11 | H R D Coporation | System and process for alkylation |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US4017263A (en) | 1977-04-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1076506A (en) | Apparatus for sulfuric acid catalyzed alkylation process | |
| US5284990A (en) | Method for converting a hydrogen fluoride alkylation unit to a sulfuric acid alkylation unit | |
| AU2008343578B2 (en) | Ionic liquid catalyzed alkylation process employing nozzles and system implementing such process | |
| EP2462093B1 (en) | Process for preparing an alkylate | |
| US5785933A (en) | Sulfuric acid alkylation reactor system with static mixers | |
| US2459636A (en) | Alkylation method and apparatus | |
| WO2009002967A2 (en) | System and process for alkylation | |
| US4783567A (en) | HF alkylation process | |
| US3956417A (en) | Isoparaffin-olefin alkylation utilizing a continuous sulfuric acid phase in a tubular reaction zone | |
| EP0184375B1 (en) | Solvent extraction and purification of acid soluble oil from an hf alkylation unit | |
| US4891466A (en) | HF alkylation process | |
| US3435092A (en) | Alkylation utilizing fine dispersion of reactants in a constant catalyst mass | |
| AU2005316998A1 (en) | Alkylation process with settler effluent recycle | |
| US5284993A (en) | Alkylation catalyst regeneration | |
| US5264649A (en) | Alkylation catalyst regeneration | |
| US4072730A (en) | Process for alkylating aromatic hydrocarbons | |
| US3098108A (en) | Coalescing sulphuric acid-hydrocarbon emulsions | |
| US20150315103A1 (en) | Process for preparing alkylate comprising an improved solids removal step | |
| US2800444A (en) | Alkylation process utilizing ultrasonics | |
| US4220806A (en) | Plural stages of hydrofluoric acid alkylation utilizing separated acid phase as catalyst in the subsequent stage | |
| US3763266A (en) | Alkylation utilizing surge chambers with settling chambers in a common catalyst system | |
| US2701184A (en) | Apparatus for carrying out catalytic reactions between hydrocarbon materials | |
| US3763267A (en) | Removing dialkyl sulfates from an alkylation reaction effluent | |
| EP0764623B1 (en) | Method for removing sulfolane present in hydrocarbon | |
| US3594444A (en) | Process for separating hydrocarbons and hydrogen fluoride catalyst from the effluent of an isoparaffin-olefin alkylation reaction zone |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |